From: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/18] brcmfmac: remove regs parameter from sdio probe functions
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:58:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386845946-9859-8-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386845946-9859-1-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com>
The chip recognition requires a base address that was provided
to it during the probe. However, the address is a fixed define
value so it is unnecessary to pass through the probe functions.
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <frankyl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 5 +----
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c | 11 ++++-------
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_chip.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_chip.h | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_host.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
index 8ba1b77..a56a779 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
@@ -992,17 +992,14 @@ static int brcmf_sdio_remove(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev)
static int brcmf_sdio_probe(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev)
{
- u32 regs = 0;
int ret = 0;
ret = brcmf_sdioh_attach(sdiodev);
if (ret)
goto out;
- regs = SI_ENUM_BASE;
-
/* try to attach to the target device */
- sdiodev->bus = brcmf_sdbrcm_probe(regs, sdiodev);
+ sdiodev->bus = brcmf_sdbrcm_probe(sdiodev);
if (!sdiodev->bus) {
brcmf_err("device attach failed\n");
ret = -ENODEV;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c
index a70feb5..24d69f4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c
@@ -3803,7 +3803,7 @@ static bool brcmf_sdbrcm_probe_malloc(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
}
static bool
-brcmf_sdbrcm_probe_attach(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, u32 regsva)
+brcmf_sdbrcm_probe_attach(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
{
u8 clkctl = 0;
int err = 0;
@@ -3835,7 +3835,7 @@ brcmf_sdbrcm_probe_attach(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, u32 regsva)
goto fail;
}
- if (brcmf_sdio_chip_attach(bus->sdiodev, &bus->ci, regsva)) {
+ if (brcmf_sdio_chip_attach(bus->sdiodev, &bus->ci)) {
brcmf_err("brcmf_sdio_chip_attach failed!\n");
goto fail;
}
@@ -4037,16 +4037,13 @@ static struct brcmf_bus_ops brcmf_sdio_bus_ops = {
.gettxq = brcmf_sdbrcm_bus_gettxq,
};
-void *brcmf_sdbrcm_probe(u32 regsva, struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev)
+void *brcmf_sdbrcm_probe(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev)
{
int ret;
struct brcmf_sdio *bus;
brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "Enter\n");
- /* We make an assumption about address window mappings:
- * regsva == SI_ENUM_BASE*/
-
/* Allocate private bus interface state */
bus = kzalloc(sizeof(struct brcmf_sdio), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!bus)
@@ -4080,7 +4077,7 @@ void *brcmf_sdbrcm_probe(u32 regsva, struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev)
}
/* attempt to attach to the dongle */
- if (!(brcmf_sdbrcm_probe_attach(bus, regsva))) {
+ if (!(brcmf_sdbrcm_probe_attach(bus))) {
brcmf_err("brcmf_sdbrcm_probe_attach failed\n");
goto fail;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_chip.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_chip.c
index 2096a14..b612808d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_chip.c
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static inline int brcmf_sdio_chip_cichk(struct chip_info *ci)
#endif
static int brcmf_sdio_chip_recognition(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev,
- struct chip_info *ci, u32 regs)
+ struct chip_info *ci)
{
u32 regdata;
int ret;
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdio_chip_recognition(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev,
* other ways of recognition should be added here.
*/
ci->c_inf[0].id = BCMA_CORE_CHIPCOMMON;
- ci->c_inf[0].base = regs;
+ ci->c_inf[0].base = SI_ENUM_BASE;
regdata = brcmf_sdio_regrl(sdiodev,
CORE_CC_REG(ci->c_inf[0].base, chipid),
NULL);
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ brcmf_sdio_chip_buscoresetup(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev,
}
int brcmf_sdio_chip_attach(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev,
- struct chip_info **ci_ptr, u32 regs)
+ struct chip_info **ci_ptr)
{
int ret;
struct chip_info *ci;
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ int brcmf_sdio_chip_attach(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev,
if (ret != 0)
goto err;
- ret = brcmf_sdio_chip_recognition(sdiodev, ci, regs);
+ ret = brcmf_sdio_chip_recognition(sdiodev, ci);
if (ret != 0)
goto err;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_chip.h b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_chip.h
index 507c61c..d0f4b45 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_chip.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_chip.h
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ struct sdpcmd_regs {
};
int brcmf_sdio_chip_attach(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev,
- struct chip_info **ci_ptr, u32 regs);
+ struct chip_info **ci_ptr);
void brcmf_sdio_chip_detach(struct chip_info **ci_ptr);
void brcmf_sdio_chip_drivestrengthinit(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev,
struct chip_info *ci, u32 drivestrength);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_host.h b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_host.h
index a1e5f72..d98b4bd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_host.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_host.h
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ int brcmf_sdio_ramrw(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev, bool write, u32 address,
/* Issue an abort to the specified function */
int brcmf_sdcard_abort(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev, uint fn);
-void *brcmf_sdbrcm_probe(u32 regsva, struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev);
+void *brcmf_sdbrcm_probe(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev);
void brcmf_sdbrcm_disconnect(void *ptr);
void brcmf_sdbrcm_isr(void *arg);
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-12 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-12 10:58 [PATCH 00/18] brcmfmac: sdio rework and msgbuf protocol changes Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 01/18] brcmfmac: add missing curly braces in brcmf_fws_txstatus_suppressed() Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 02/18] brcmfmac: combine bcmsdh source files into one Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 03/18] brcmfmac: remove unnecessary function prototypes Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 04/18] brcmfmac: remove unused struct brcmf_sdio_dev::func_cis_ptr attribute Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 05/18] brcmfmac: use sdio functions to enable/disable F2 Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 06/18] brcmfmac: remove brcmf_sdio_regrw_helper() from header file Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:58 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2013-12-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 08/18] brcmfmac: get rid of some void pointer parameters Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 09/18] brcmfmac: remove brcmf_sdio_wdtimer_enable() function Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 10/18] brcmfmac: use consistent function names in bcmsdh.c Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:58 ` [PATCH 11/18] brcmfmac: reduce function parameters in sdio send/receive calls Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:59 ` [PATCH 12/18] brcmfmac: Move common BCDC code in single function Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:59 ` [PATCH 13/18] brcmfmac: Fix hex dump for FWIL Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:59 ` [PATCH 14/18] brcmfmac: Add definition of new protocol layer msgbuf Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:59 ` [PATCH 15/18] brcmfmac: Combine protocol push hdr and bus txdata Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:59 ` [PATCH 16/18] brcmfmac: use consistent function names in dhd_sdio.c Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:59 ` [PATCH 17/18] brcmfmac: remove brcmf_sdio_disconnect() function Arend van Spriel
2013-12-12 10:59 ` [PATCH 18/18] brcmfmac: clarify struct brcmf_sdio_dev::func[0] reference Arend van Spriel
2013-12-13 9:02 ` [PATCH 00/18] brcmfmac: sdio rework and msgbuf protocol changes Arend van Spriel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1386845946-9859-8-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).