From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.107]:52055 "EHLO emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751382AbaB0Ga3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 01:30:29 -0500 Message-ID: <1393482626.13669.5.camel@dubbel> (sfid-20140227_073033_086932_7604ED7D) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.14.0-rc4 v2 8/10] rsi: USB functionality From: Luca Coelho To: Dan Williams Cc: Fariya Fathima , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:30:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1393437326.23587.5.camel@dcbw.local> References: <1845351523-16314@mail.redpinesignals.com> <1393437326.23587.5.camel@dcbw.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 11:55 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 17:11 +0530, Fariya Fathima wrote: > > Hello Dan, > > > > Thanks for your valuable feedback. We have already started working on your comments. However, I was just thinking whether I should re-submit the patches (based on your comments) or wait for day or two for more feedback from Johannes and others. What do your suggest? > > Waiting a couple days for more feedback from Johannes and others would > not hurt. Sometimes people that are really busy wait for a "clean" submission (ie. one where there are no pending comments) before they start reviewing it, so they don't stumble into things that were already spotted by others. I prefer a faster turnaround of new versions of the patches (though don't look at me as a best example of doing this :P). Just my 2c. -- Luca.