From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Jean-Pierre Tosoni <jp.tosoni@acksys.fr>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mac80211: double processing of probe response frames ?
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:40:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1393519239.4648.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000c01cf3312$b8131540$28393fc0$@acksys.fr> (sfid-20140226_194231_040116_EB122CE8)
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 17:49 +0100, Jean-Pierre Tosoni wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using mac80211 and ath9k.
> I put a debug trace in the net/wireless/scan.c, in
> cfg80211_inform_bss_frame().
> I exercise scanning with wpa_supplicant and I monitor the air with
> wireshark/airpcapN.
> Each time a probe response frame is received, I can see that
> cfg80211_inform_bss_frame() is called *twice.*
>
> I wonder if this is really needed ? Is it possible to remove one of the
> calls ?
>
> AFAICT, mac80211/scan.c/ieee80211_bss_info_update() is called along two
> paths,
> 1) in mac80211/rx.c, from __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet() and
> ieee80211_scan_rx()
> 2) in mac80211/mlme.c, from the work queue calling
> ieee80211_sta_rx_queued_mgmt()
> => ieee80211_rx_mgmt_probe_resp() => ieee80211_rx_bss_info()
>
> Maybe part of the call to ieee80211_scan_rx() could be delayed and merged
> later when ieee80211_rx_mgmt_probe_resp() is called ? Any comments ?
Not easily - the latter call is very much filtered. However, the
scan_rx() one should only do something during scan, I believe, and the
other *not* during scan?
johannes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-27 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 16:49 mac80211: double processing of probe response frames ? Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2014-02-27 16:40 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1393519239.4648.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jp.tosoni@acksys.fr \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).