From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45641 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751125AbaB0RDn (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:03:43 -0500 Message-ID: <1393520708.9637.16.camel@dcbw.local> (sfid-20140227_180346_723305_A2FA7579) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.14.0-rc4 v2 8/10] rsi: USB functionality From: Dan Williams To: Luca Coelho Cc: Fariya Fathima , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:05:08 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1393482626.13669.5.camel@dubbel> References: <1845351523-16314@mail.redpinesignals.com> <1393437326.23587.5.camel@dcbw.local> <1393482626.13669.5.camel@dubbel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 08:30 +0200, Luca Coelho wrote: > On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 11:55 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 17:11 +0530, Fariya Fathima wrote: > > > Hello Dan, > > > > > > Thanks for your valuable feedback. We have already started working on your comments. However, I was just thinking whether I should re-submit the patches (based on your comments) or wait for day or two for more feedback from Johannes and others. What do your suggest? > > > > Waiting a couple days for more feedback from Johannes and others would > > not hurt. > > Sometimes people that are really busy wait for a "clean" submission (ie. > one where there are no pending comments) before they start reviewing it, > so they don't stumble into things that were already spotted by others. > I prefer a faster turnaround of new versions of the patches (though > don't look at me as a best example of doing this :P). Fariya, if you don't hear anything from anyone else by the end of the week, just respin the patches and repost to the list. Dan