Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] wilink: add device tree support

[Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>]

On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 14:29 +0200, Luca Coelho wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 08:26 +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This patch series adds device tree support to the wlcore_sdio driver,
> > > which is used by WiLink6, WiLink7 and WiLink8.
> > >
> > > The first patches do some clean-up to make the data needed in the
> > > wilink device tree node smaller.  The remaining patches implement the
> > > actual device tree node parsing in wlcore_sdio.
> > >
> > > Regarding the XTAL clock issues, for now we don't support XTAL mode
> > > with DT, but I have sent a proposal for a small change in the clock
> > > framework to support this, but it's still under discussions [1].
> > >
> > > The DTS file changes will be sent separately, since they need to go
> > > via different trees.
> > >
> > > A new version of the bindings documentation has been sent [2] and, if
> > > no more comments are given to it, I'll apply it via my tree.
> > >
> > > [1] http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=1372971912-10877-1-git-send-email-coelho@ti.com
> > > [2] http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=1375109728-5931-1-git-send-email-coelho@ti.com
> > >
> > > Changes in v4:
> > >
> > > * Rebased on top of 3.11-rc3 (eg. no more changes on the board files
> > >   that were removed);
> > >
> > > * Use the new irq_get_trigger_type() instead of
> > >   irqd_get_trigger_type() (thanks Javier);
> > >
> > > * Added some missing const's (thanks Felipe);
> > >
> > > * Reverted Tony's workaround to get WiLink to work on Panda while DT
> > >   was not supported yet.
> > >
> > >
> > > Please review.
> > 
> > What is the state of the series? Who is now responsible for the
> > patches? What issues were still not handled?
> 
> There were some comments about this series (or more precisely, the one
> that added the bindings documentation[1]).  Unfortunately, I have left
> TI since and have no time to handle them.  Feel free to pick it up and
> continue from there.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/30/712

There's also this thread, which I'm not sure has been resolved:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1520752

--
Luca.