Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mac80211: implement chanctx reservation

[Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>]

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 12:54 +0100, Michal Kazior wrote:
> On 28 February 2014 13:23, Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +int ieee80211_vif_reserve_chanctx(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> > +                                 const struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef)
> > +{
> > +       struct ieee80211_local *local = sdata->local;
> > +       struct ieee80211_chanctx_conf *conf;
> > +       struct ieee80211_chanctx *new_ctx, *curr_ctx;
> > +       int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +       mutex_lock(&local->chanctx_mtx);
> > +
> > +       conf = rcu_dereference_protected(sdata->vif.chanctx_conf,
> > +                                        lockdep_is_held(&local->chanctx_mtx));
> > +       if (!conf) {
> > +               ret = -EINVAL;
> > +               goto out;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       curr_ctx = container_of(conf, struct ieee80211_chanctx, conf);
> > +
> > +       /* try to find another context with the chandef we want */
> > +       new_ctx = ieee80211_find_chanctx(local, chandef,
> > +                                        IEEE80211_CHANCTX_SHARED);
> > +       if (!new_ctx) {
> > +               /* create a new context */
> > +               new_ctx = ieee80211_new_chanctx(local, chandef,
> > +                                               IEEE80211_CHANCTX_SHARED);
> 
> Shouldn't you use curr_ctx->mode here instead of SHARED? Or perhaps
> the function should take `mode` argument..
> 
> For CSA it's probably okay to just use curr_ctx->mode, but for a more
> generic reservation it should probably be an argument.

You're right.  I'll add mode as an argument to this function in v4.

--
Luca