From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ea0-f170.google.com ([209.85.215.170]:37463 "EHLO mail-ea0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753146AbaCGRbi (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2014 12:31:38 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f170.google.com with SMTP id g15so2439235eak.15 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 09:31:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1394213496.25640.4.camel@umadbro> (sfid-20140307_183142_344256_2748CFA7) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/8] nl80211: Support for 5/10 MHz channels when reporting BW restrictions From: Rostislav Lisovy To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Michal Sojka , s.sander@nordsys.de, jan-niklas.meier@volkswagen.de Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:31:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1394202590.4653.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1394199475-5208-1-git-send-email-rostislav.lisovy@fel.cvut.cz> <1394199475-5208-7-git-send-email-rostislav.lisovy@fel.cvut.cz> (sfid-20140307_143812_856469_1F424A6E) <1394202590.4653.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 15:29 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > This is the part of the code that I was referring to before, you > should > skip these channels if (!large) to not break older tools with too much > data. The whole channel (not only these attributes) should be excluded if the 'split wiphy info' is not supported? I thought that reporting these attributes only 'if (large)' is a safe solution (except the userspace will be lacking some information). Thanks; Rostislav