From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-netdev <linux-netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: net_timedelta() affected by settimeofday() (was: [patch 12/13] net: mac80211: Remove silly timespec dance)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:35:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402562114.8095.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1406121017500.5170@nanos>
+netdev, Stephen
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 10:19 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 23:59 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > > + msrmnt = ktime_to_ms(net_timedelta(skb_arv));
> >
> > This is probably more of a question about net_timedelta(), but is
> > ktime_get_real() really appropriate for duration measurements? Isn't
> > that non-monotonic?
>
> Well, it's monotonic, but might be affected by settimeofday().
Right, but isn't that odd? Suddenly your delay measurement here might be
minutes, hours, or years if you settimeofday() between timestamping and
calculating the delta. That seems very strange to me, why would that be
the right behaviour in any way?
Now, it seems that there are only two current users of net_timedelta()
(in DCCP) so perhaps it's not too late to change some of this?
Maybe in general the skb timestamp should be based on a different clock
and only adjusted to real time when used in userspace?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-12 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20140611234024.103571777@linutronix.de>
2014-06-11 23:59 ` [patch 04/13] net: mac80211: Use ktime_get_ts() Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-12 6:53 ` Johannes Berg
2014-06-12 9:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-06-12 9:51 ` [Cocci] " Julia.Lawall
2014-06-12 10:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-11 23:59 ` [patch 11/13] wireless: mwifiex: Use the proper interfaces Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-12 3:22 ` Bing Zhao
2014-06-12 8:31 ` [patch V2] " Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-12 8:38 ` Johannes Berg
2014-06-13 18:28 ` Bing Zhao
2014-06-11 23:59 ` [patch 12/13] net: mac80211: Remove silly timespec dance Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-12 6:49 ` Johannes Berg
2014-06-12 8:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-12 8:35 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2014-06-12 8:39 ` net_timedelta() affected by settimeofday() (was: [patch 12/13] net: mac80211: Remove silly timespec dance) Johannes Berg
2014-06-12 8:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-12 9:21 ` Johannes Berg
2014-06-12 14:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-13 17:58 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1402562114.8095.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).