From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:39384 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756178AbaLWP6k (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:58:40 -0500 Message-ID: <1419350316.6091.9.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20141223_165843_074848_89CDC23F) Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: add extensible feature flag attribute From: Johannes Berg To: Arend van Spriel Cc: linux-wireless , Gautam Kumar Shukla , Avinash Patil Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:58:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1419350119-29166-1-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com> References: <1419350119-29166-1-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 16:55 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > From: Gautam Kumar Shukla > > With the wiphy::features flag being used up this patch adds a > new field wiphy::ext_features. Considering extensibility this > new field is declared as a byte array. This extensible flag is > exposed to user-space by NL80211_ATTR_EXT_FEATURES. Ah, I guess this will compile without even any flags defined, so Avinash, you can just build on top of this and define the first flag, and for the sake of attribution I'll apply it as two separate patches. Thanks Arend. johannes