linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: fix deadlock during reg chan check
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:50:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1420638611.3407.14.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+XVXffmhz969NFRTyvKxJjBtHat-aO+GOCSo_MfJROCiWqQ7g@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20150107_144913_204913_20AF85C1)

On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 15:48 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> >> > Also, the only reason this can happen anyway is when you call "can
> >> >> > beacon" for a station interface - which seems nonsensical. Given that
> >> >>
> >> >> This is not true. This happens with current code for a p2p-go
> >> >> interface during channel validity checks in reg.c.
> >> >
> >> > Not sure I see this? The only thing doing wdev locking is
> >> > cfg80211_go_permissive_chan(), no? And that only for station interfaces.
> >>
> >> cfg80211_go_permissive_chan is called from cfg80211_reg_can_beacon,
> >> currently only for GO interfaces, but for STA also in the future
> >> (hopefully).
> >> The latter is called during channel validity checks for GO.
> >
> > Ok.
> >
> > Should I just apply the patch as it is then?
> 
> It fixes a real existing deadlock, so I think so, yea.

Is it needed on 3.19?

johannes


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-07 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-29  9:59 [PATCH] cfg80211: fix deadlock during reg chan check Arik Nemtsov
2015-01-06 10:51 ` Johannes Berg
2015-01-07 13:34   ` Arik Nemtsov
2015-01-07 13:37     ` Johannes Berg
2015-01-07 13:42       ` Arik Nemtsov
2015-01-07 13:46         ` Johannes Berg
2015-01-07 13:48           ` Arik Nemtsov
2015-01-07 13:50             ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2015-01-07 13:52               ` Arik Nemtsov
2015-01-07 13:54 ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1420638611.3407.14.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=arik@wizery.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).