Re: [RFC 1/2] cfg80211: add VHT support for IBSS

[Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>]

On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 09:35 +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:


> + * @IBSS_PARAMS_DISABLE_HT:  Disable HT (802.11n)
> + * @IBSS_PARAMS_DISABLE_VHT:  Disable VHT

If you list 11n (don't think you need to) maybe also ist 11ac? :)
Or just remove 11n.

> + * @flags See &enum cfg80211_ibss_params_flags

missing :

>   * @ht_capa:  HT Capabilities over-rides.  Values set in ht_capa_mask
>   *	will be used in ht_capa.  Un-supported values will be ignored.
>   * @ht_capa_mask:  The bits of ht_capa which are to be used.
> + * @vht_capa:  VHT Capability overrides

why two spaces? :)

>  /**
>   * enum nl80211_ext_feature_index - bit index of extended features.
> + * @NL80211_FEATURE_VHT_IBSS: This driver supports IBSS with VHT datarates.
>   *
>   * @NUM_NL80211_EXT_FEATURES: number of extended features.
>   * @MAX_NL80211_EXT_FEATURES: highest extended feature index.
>   */
>  enum nl80211_ext_feature_index {
> +	NL80211_FEATURE_VHT_IBSS,

Yay, first bit :)

> @@ -7258,6 +7268,9 @@ static int nl80211_join_ibss(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>  			return err;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (nla_get_flag(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_DISABLE_HT]))
> +		ibss.flags |= IBSS_PARAMS_DISABLE_HT;

That should perhaps be a separate patch? Also - it seems you need to
check somewhere that people aren't configuring 80 MHz with disable-VHT?
And similar for HT actually - is this new?

johannes