From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:55051 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755918AbbCCKel (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 05:34:41 -0500 Message-ID: <1425378875.2450.40.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150303_113530_727100_182AC221) Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/14] wireless: Use eth__addr instead of memset From: Johannes Berg To: Joe Perches Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:34:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1425378573.17273.9.camel@perches.com> References: <0c710456e4875ff00c1a9fcff9378ed15110dcd3.1425354528.git.joe@perches.com> <1425370617.2450.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1425371858.17273.3.camel@perches.com> <1425372295.2450.9.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1425372748.17273.6.camel@perches.com> <1425373219.2450.13.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1425378573.17273.9.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 02:29 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > Nope, you simply misunderstood what I did write. > > What I said was that the arguments were likely > already aligned(2), not that the alignment was > a requirement. Fair enough. That's not actually true/guaranteed though as far as this patch is concerned. johannes