From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0184.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.184]:45329 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932193AbbCPRMJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:12:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1426525919.23897.11.camel@perches.com> (sfid-20150316_181247_230243_BD2F2476) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] checkpatch clean-up of rtl8723au's rtw_security.c From: Joe Perches To: Greg KH Cc: Jes Sorensen , "M. Vefa Bicakci" , Matthias Beyer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:11:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150316170714.GB20171@kroah.com> References: <1426378241-32469-1-git-send-email-m.v.b@runbox.com> <20150315093142.GY24643@lucy.3gs> <10669062.ZZNVxH5Tl9@lenny> <1426524927.23897.9.camel@perches.com> <20150316170714.GB20171@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 18:07 +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:55:27AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 12:01 -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > > For staging patches, you should always post patches against the > > > staging-next tree. Please rebase them and repost them. > > Greg is now preferring patches against his > > staging-testing branch > staging-testing only lasts a day or so before it turns into > staging-next, so you are usually safe with using staging-next. Yeah but that usually is nothing but painful for those that are unfortunate enough to hit it.