From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, james.l.morris@oracle.com,
serge@hallyn.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <david.woodhouse@intel.com>,
Joey Lee <jlee@suse.de>, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
mricon@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] linux-firmware key arrangement for firmware signing
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 15:52:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432669955.2450.269.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150526180813.0ba1b5f5@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 18:08 +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> IMHO we want the supplier of a given firmware providing signatures on
> the firmware git tree if this is done. A generic linux-firmware owned key
> would be both a horrendously inviting attack target, and a single point of
> failure.
>
> Git can already do all the needed commit signing bits unless I'm missing
> something here ?
Nice! I haven't tried signing commits yet. Assuming the signatures can
be extracted from git, the firmware blob git commit signature could be
stored either as a security xattr or appended (eg. similar to kernel
modules). The end system owner could then make the decision to load the
associated public key or not.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-26 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-19 20:02 [RFD] linux-firmware key arrangement for firmware signing Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-05-19 20:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-05-19 20:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-19 22:11 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-05-19 22:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-21 15:51 ` David Howells
2015-05-21 16:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2015-05-21 16:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-21 16:51 ` Petko Manolov
2015-05-21 16:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-21 17:44 ` Petko Manolov
2015-05-21 16:43 ` Petko Manolov
2015-05-21 16:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-21 16:58 ` Petko Manolov
2015-05-21 16:59 ` Mimi Zohar
2015-05-19 23:30 ` Julian Calaby
2015-05-19 23:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-20 0:39 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-05-20 0:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-21 22:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-05-21 23:15 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-05-19 21:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2015-05-19 22:19 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-05-19 23:37 ` Mimi Zohar
2015-05-20 0:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-05-20 1:06 ` Mimi Zohar
2015-05-20 1:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-20 2:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2015-05-20 2:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-20 15:49 ` Petko Manolov
2015-05-20 16:08 ` Petko Manolov
2015-05-20 14:04 ` Seth Forshee
2015-05-20 15:08 ` David Howells
2015-05-20 15:47 ` Seth Forshee
2015-05-21 16:23 ` David Howells
2015-05-20 16:24 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-05-20 16:46 ` Petko Manolov
2015-05-21 4:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-21 5:41 ` Petko Manolov
2015-05-21 6:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-21 13:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2015-05-21 15:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-21 15:53 ` Petko Manolov
2015-05-21 16:57 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-26 17:08 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-05-26 19:15 ` Petko Manolov
2015-05-26 19:52 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2015-05-26 23:06 ` David Howells
2015-05-21 16:03 ` Woodhouse, David
2015-05-21 16:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2015-05-21 16:31 ` Woodhouse, David
2015-05-21 17:02 ` gregkh
2015-05-21 17:14 ` Petko Manolov
2015-05-21 18:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-05-21 18:30 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-05-21 19:32 ` Woodhouse, David
2015-05-21 17:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-05-21 14:45 ` Petko Manolov
2015-05-21 22:50 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-05-20 20:35 ` Kyle McMartin
2015-05-20 15:14 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432669955.2450.269.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david.woodhouse@intel.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=jlee@suse.de \
--cc=kyle@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
--cc=mricon@kernel.org \
--cc=petkan@mip-labs.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).