From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC next 2/2] net: rfkill: gpio: simplify code flow
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 14:45:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432903510.16701.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150529124230.GJ18985@pengutronix.de>
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 14:42 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 01:17:04PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 11:46 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > When assigning directly to the pointer contained in the driver data the
> > > local variable can be dropped together with the extra assignment to it.
> >
> > I'm not really sure I see the big benefit of this? It doesn't really
> > seem to make the code much easier to read/follow.
> >
> > I also don't really see the (perceived) objection with "dynamic memory"
> > though since that memory is freed pretty much immediately as soon as we
> > return a non-zero value from this function ... the function itself
> > allocates the memory, and clearly we return without it ever being able
> > to use it, so ...
> >
> > Anyway - I might apply this for the few removed lines of code, but only
> > with a better commit log.
> Alternatively squash it into patch 1/2 and add:
>
> While touching the code simplify it a bit to not need a local
> variable for the gpio descriptors.
Too late, already applied & pushed out the other one.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-29 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-28 9:46 [PATCH next 0/2] net: rfkill: gpio: make better use of gpiod API Uwe Kleine-König
2015-05-28 9:46 ` [PATCH next 1/2] " Uwe Kleine-König
2015-05-29 11:11 ` Johannes Berg
2015-05-28 9:46 ` [PATCH RFC next 2/2] net: rfkill: gpio: simplify code flow Uwe Kleine-König
2015-05-29 11:17 ` Johannes Berg
2015-05-29 12:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-05-29 12:45 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2015-05-29 12:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-05-29 12:48 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432903510.16701.0.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).