linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Wojciech Dubowik <Wojciech.Dubowik@neratec.com>
Cc: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Fix double locking on CSA counter update
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 16:40:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433169656.3505.13.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <556C6AEB.9070407@neratec.com> (sfid-20150601_162345_309420_15E143F0)

On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 16:23 +0200, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
> On 01/06/15 16:13, Julian Calaby wrote:
> > Hi Wojciech,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Wojciech Dubowik
> > <Wojciech.Dubowik@neratec.com> wrote:
> >> We call rcu locked ieee80211_csa_update_counter from
> >> already locked section. Fix it by decrementing counter
> >> directly instead of calling ieee80211_csa_update_counter.
> > Stupid question: wouldn't it be better to split the work from
> > ieee80211_csa_update_counter() into a separate function without
> > locking and call that instead?
> Yes. It would be better for maintenance. It's just that they will
> have different input parameters
> 
> ieee80211_csa_update_counter(struct ieee80211_vif *
> __ieee80211_csa_update_counter(struct beacon_data *
> 
> as it doesn't make sense to dereference beacon twice.
> 
> I guess it's not a problem?

Seems fine to me.

johannes


      reply	other threads:[~2015-06-01 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-01 13:54 [PATCH] mac80211: Fix double locking on CSA counter update Wojciech Dubowik
2015-06-01 14:13 ` Julian Calaby
2015-06-01 14:23   ` Wojciech Dubowik
2015-06-01 14:40     ` Johannes Berg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1433169656.3505.13.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=Wojciech.Dubowik@neratec.com \
    --cc=julian.calaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).