From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:35203 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750763AbbFKKBm (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 06:01:42 -0400 Message-ID: <1434016900.1915.8.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150611_120146_009184_3158A9E9) Subject: Re: Exposing enum ieee80211_channel_flags to user From: Johannes Berg To: =?UTF-8?Q?Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:01:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20150611_120017_614164_3F327AEA) References: <1434015922.1915.6.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1434016002.1915.7.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20150611_120017_614164_3F327AEA) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 12:00 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > Upon rereading, I think my preference would be to remove much of the > > channel list information and add a separate iw command. > > Do you mean removing channel list from "iw phy X info"? I'm not sure I'd remove it completely - but perhaps remove all the detail information like DFS time etc. that's just making it really large? I.e. go back to just having a single line of information. > Can you suggest the new command name? "iw phy X channels" would work? johannes