From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/4] mac80211: use static keys for hw flags
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 08:37:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447227472.2276.7.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447201345.2475.15.camel@coelho.fi>
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 02:22 +0200, Luca Coelho wrote:
>
> Now that you have all these options in Kconfig, wouldn't it be
> possible
> to remove the calls to the "static" ieee80211_hw_set() in the drivers
> and somehow set all the flags that are defined in Kconfig
> automatically?
>
Since Kconfig flags are global (across multiple drivers) I don't really
see a way to do that.
I'd *love*, however, to have an "increment" in Kconfig, then I could
get rid of the _OFF ones:
config MAC80211_NUM_DRIVERS
int
config MAC80211_HW_HAS_RATE_CONTROL
int
config MY_DRIVER
depends on MAC80211
increment MAC80211_NUM_DRIVERS
increment MAC80211_HW_MYFLAG
and then later
if (CONFIG_MAC80211_HW_MYFLAG == 0)
/* optimise for flag OFF */
else if (CONFIG_MAC80211_HW_MYFLAG > 0 &&
CONFIG_MAC80211_NUM_DRIVERS == CONFIG_MAC80211_HW_MYFLAG)
/* optimise for flag ON */
else if (CONFIG_MAC80211_HW_MYFLAG > 0)
/* don't optimise */
That's far more maintainable in the long term, since each driver only
needs to list in its Kconfig the flags it *wants*, not *all*.
Maybe I'll try to see if I can hack Kconfig to do that.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-11 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-10 8:52 [RFC v2 0/4] mac80211: jump labels for hw flags Johannes Berg
2015-11-10 8:52 ` [RFC v2 1/4] mac80211: add ieee80211_hw_clear() Johannes Berg
2015-11-10 8:52 ` [RFC v2 2/4] mac80211: introduce ieee80211_local_check() Johannes Berg
2015-11-10 8:52 ` [RFC v2 3/4] mac80211: use static keys for hw flags Johannes Berg
2015-11-11 0:22 ` Luca Coelho
2015-11-11 7:37 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2015-11-11 13:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-11 13:39 ` Johannes Berg
2015-11-11 14:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-11 14:29 ` Johannes Berg
2015-11-11 14:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-11 15:05 ` Johannes Berg
2015-11-10 8:52 ` [RFC v2 4/4] mac80211: test the static key code Johannes Berg
2015-11-10 9:11 ` [RFC v2 5/4] mac80211: generate hw flags from include file Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1447227472.2276.7.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca@coelho.fi \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).