From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0143.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.143]:51767 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750855AbcACH33 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jan 2016 02:29:29 -0500 Message-ID: <1451806163.4334.36.camel@perches.com> (sfid-20160103_083041_959818_1051F49F) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] NFC-mei_phy: Refactoring for mei_nfc_connect() From: Joe Perches To: SF Markus Elfring , Julian Calaby Cc: linux-wireless , Aloisio Almeida Jr , Lauro Ramos Venancio , Samuel Ortiz , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 23:29:23 -0800 In-Reply-To: <5688C712.3070900@users.sourceforge.net> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <56883849.2080304@users.sourceforge.net> <5688390B.3080800@users.sourceforge.net> <5688C712.3070900@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 08:00 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > >         r = 0; > > > - > > > -err: > > > +free_reply: > > >         kfree(reply); > > > +free_cmd: > > >         kfree(cmd); > > > - > > > > Why are you deleting the two blank lines here? > > Can they be unnecessary at this source code place > according to the Linux coding style convention? As far as I know, there's no linux specific accepted convention for blank lines preceding labels. My personal preference is for a blank line before a new block, but not before the second and subsequent labels in an error handling block.