From: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] brcmfmac: change brcmf_sdio_wd_timer() prototype
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:05:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1451988350-2197-4-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451988350-2197-1-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com>
The function brcmf_sdio_wd_timer() has wdtick parameter. However, it
is only called with two values and as such the parameter is replaced
with boolean value indicating the timer should be active or not.
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Franky (Zhenhui) Lin <frankyl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
---
.../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 33 ++++++++--------------
.../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
index ceb2a75..2f02020 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
@@ -503,8 +503,7 @@ struct brcmf_sdio {
struct timer_list timer;
struct completion watchdog_wait;
struct task_struct *watchdog_tsk;
- bool wd_timer_valid;
- uint save_ms;
+ bool wd_active;
struct workqueue_struct *brcmf_wq;
struct work_struct datawork;
@@ -961,7 +960,7 @@ end:
brcmf_sdio_clkctl(bus, CLK_NONE, pendok);
} else {
brcmf_sdio_clkctl(bus, CLK_AVAIL, pendok);
- brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS);
+ brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, true);
}
bus->sleeping = sleep;
brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "new state %s\n",
@@ -3576,7 +3575,7 @@ static void brcmf_sdio_bus_watchdog(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
if (bus->idlecount > bus->idletime) {
brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "idle\n");
sdio_claim_host(bus->sdiodev->func[1]);
- brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, 0);
+ brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, false);
bus->idlecount = 0;
brcmf_sdio_bus_sleep(bus, true, false);
sdio_release_host(bus->sdiodev->func[1]);
@@ -3908,7 +3907,7 @@ brcmf_sdio_watchdog(unsigned long data)
if (bus->watchdog_tsk) {
complete(&bus->watchdog_wait);
/* Reschedule the watchdog */
- if (bus->wd_timer_valid)
+ if (bus->wd_active)
mod_timer(&bus->timer,
jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS));
}
@@ -3950,7 +3949,7 @@ static void brcmf_sdio_firmware_callback(struct device *dev,
/* Start the watchdog timer */
bus->sdcnt.tickcnt = 0;
- brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS);
+ brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, true);
sdio_claim_host(sdiodev->func[1]);
@@ -4195,7 +4194,7 @@ void brcmf_sdio_remove(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
if (bus->ci) {
if (bus->sdiodev->state != BRCMF_SDIOD_NOMEDIUM) {
sdio_claim_host(bus->sdiodev->func[1]);
- brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, 0);
+ brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(bus, false);
brcmf_sdio_clkctl(bus, CLK_AVAIL, false);
/* Leave the device in state where it is
* 'passive'. This is done by resetting all
@@ -4217,13 +4216,12 @@ void brcmf_sdio_remove(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "Disconnected\n");
}
-void brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, uint wdtick)
+void brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, bool active)
{
/* Totally stop the timer */
- if (!wdtick && bus->wd_timer_valid) {
+ if (!active && bus->wd_active) {
del_timer_sync(&bus->timer);
- bus->wd_timer_valid = false;
- bus->save_ms = wdtick;
+ bus->wd_active = false;
return;
}
@@ -4231,27 +4229,20 @@ void brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, uint wdtick)
if (bus->sdiodev->state != BRCMF_SDIOD_DATA)
return;
- if (wdtick) {
- if (bus->save_ms != BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS) {
- if (bus->wd_timer_valid)
- /* Stop timer and restart at new value */
- del_timer_sync(&bus->timer);
-
+ if (active) {
+ if (!bus->wd_active) {
/* Create timer again when watchdog period is
dynamically changed or in the first instance
*/
bus->timer.expires =
jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS);
add_timer(&bus->timer);
-
+ bus->wd_active = true;
} else {
/* Re arm the timer, at last watchdog period */
mod_timer(&bus->timer,
jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS));
}
-
- bus->wd_timer_valid = true;
- bus->save_ms = wdtick;
}
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h
index d86ecf2..ff47cee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ struct brcmf_sdio *brcmf_sdio_probe(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev);
void brcmf_sdio_remove(struct brcmf_sdio *bus);
void brcmf_sdio_isr(struct brcmf_sdio *bus);
-void brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, uint wdtick);
+void brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, bool active);
void brcmf_sdio_wowl_config(struct device *dev, bool enabled);
int brcmf_sdio_sleep(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, bool sleep);
void brcmf_sdio_trigger_dpc(struct brcmf_sdio *bus);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 10:05 [PATCH 0/6] brcmfmac: extend wowl and cleanup Arend van Spriel
2016-01-05 10:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] brcmfmac: Add wowl net detect support Arend van Spriel
2016-01-08 8:45 ` [1/6] " Kalle Valo
2016-01-05 10:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] brcmfmac: Reshuffle functions to avoid forward declarations Arend van Spriel
2016-01-05 10:05 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2016-01-05 10:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] brcmfmac: use msecs_to_jiffies() in macro definitions Arend van Spriel
2016-01-05 10:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] brcmfmac: use jiffies for timeout in btcoex Arend van Spriel
2016-01-05 10:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] brcmfmac: Do not handle link downs for ibss Arend van Spriel
2016-01-07 23:05 ` [PATCH 0/6] brcmfmac: extend wowl and cleanup Arend van Spriel
2016-01-08 8:47 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1451988350-2197-4-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).