From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:57161 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752365AbcBZJsB (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 04:48:01 -0500 Message-ID: <1456480074.5284.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20160226_104810_817396_0D7D9C5D) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211_hwsim: Set global RRM capability From: Johannes Berg To: Fengguang Wu , Kalle Valo Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach , kbuild-all@01.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, David Spinadel , "Ye, Xiaolong" Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:47:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20160226081836.GA6470@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> References: <201602251751.QT2WO50c%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <87y4a8lz44.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <20160226081836.GA6470@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 16:18 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: >  > > I think this build failure is because mac80211_hwsim is an > > exception to > > other wireless drivers and is applied via mac80211-next. Should we > > add > > an entry for mac80211_hwsim to MAINTAINERS with the correct git > > tree? I > > think kbuild test robot follows MAINTAINERS file nowdays (or at > > least I > > understood that's the plan). > > That's right. The robot parses MAINTAINERS when judging which tree > to apply LKML patches to. > Great. I'll add a commit to make mac80211_hwsim just part of the MAC80211 entry. johannes