From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CBB83955FF; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783669299; cv=none; b=LPqOVMOu596jxrQ4OBJYqhs620+5Qe56/vnVy3sRpGN1leX4Y13Y/QEFlWjY0IlTaBnk0NsswvkQxF8XiLf1hnKnaMa3/ELcwWjEtnaLH0Gdr0LksMj5GWilmS1fimL+XzlL/vW2TiJ14Pn3oYrEa3Cqb3dJ6SnJB/lmNkok8oA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783669299; c=relaxed/simple; bh=H9E+vsON3Wn/y6sOQ+KBXeGGBuShMK2/+uOQXtxMSTI=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=eEI1qN0rehBTkwNl+gTguO2rCQ1ecSd9FGEKdnVNh7tDYHR8SLQZHwK/wiJTh/BoUneSiiP7PwPaae+t4ndtRNUZ93CJCuBoLBZZ7EXZ6zedwNf14eHSJpkH4lJIK64ZSH37HBJPXFT2HnHgGLsOAT/+dvUNHvbS6qZ6GCUFyYU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=permerror header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=nlPXApL6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=permerror header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="nlPXApL6" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=H9E+vsON3Wn/y6sOQ+KBXeGGBuShMK2/+uOQXtxMSTI=; t=1783669297; x=1784878897; b=nlPXApL6jJxtueiht+whEGMss7CDE4DayEbqYr+3zlBxT/V dB+9tc/Sm0RuXWoTtyKpCQsc8R5/+APXCq6yjLiLb7/U8BiCNmE3ReTi7k37xHxadWJKM/kw5VQmH /rinnu5bfOCc2+/bBH1xwL4NOO9ovtErBDvtrpNeRloyKYzF8/3mpxPKFQSO7TGixeHpr9CUd6ibP Wxba5VhxJEyzdTvz24S3Xsf94S9AwyuF/8bDRg1ms/quT66sUpiL09zpAzBEjjm0UPqwylCKZGkfS fm1a0RqwThP8Urx8B9dHOJdTQ0zRiHJ3U47JS4rq4F3IoWTjYmm9rOFkOAWJCZIQ==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__ECDSA_SECP256R1_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wi5rT-0000000CHG3-2091; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:41:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1462bcdb0944bfd3ae7ac9618cc59ab6cf75dfc6.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mwifiex: bound uAP association event IEs to the event buffer From: Johannes Berg To: Francesco Dolcini , HE WEI =?UTF-8?Q?=28=E3=82=AE=E3=82=AB=E3=82=AF=29?= , Brian Norris Cc: Miri Korenblit , Kalle Valo , Kees Cook , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:41:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20260710072140.GA17790@francesco-nb> References: <20260629120333.94222-1-skyexpoc@gmail.com> <20260710072140.GA17790@francesco-nb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.3 (3.58.3-1.fc43) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Fri, 2026-07-10 at 09:21 +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > I think we received a few patches that are validating the data received > from the firmware (including this one). >=20 > I did not review any of them yet, what is your opinion on those? >=20 > Should we consider the firmware trust-worth or should we validate > everything we receive from it? Is there some agreement on this topic in > general? I don't really know fully "in general", but I/we generally treat these as issues. I'm not going to worry too much about them, but I think we should fix them. johannes