From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Purushottam Kushwaha <pkushwah@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, jouni@qca.qualcomm.com,
usdutt@qti.qualcomm.com, amarnath@qca.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] cfg80211: Provision to allow the support for different beacon intervals
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:24:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473675843.29016.18.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472649972-6649-1-git-send-email-pkushwah@qti.qualcomm.com>
Hmm. Apart from some misleading documentation, that doesn't mention
"GCD" at all, the logic seems odd.
In order to validate a new beacon interval, you're first looking up the
min GCD value of all the combinations that allow the *current*
scenario, but doing that matching without the right # of channels or
radar detect parameters? And then you're trying to match that to the
new beacon interval?
It seems to me that the logic should be something like:
If the driver specified diff_beacon_int_gcd_min, then don't do anything
in cfg80211_validate_beacon_int(), other than perhaps a minimal range
check against the minimum of all diff_beacon_int_gcd_min values for all
combinations.
Then, add a new argument to cfg80211_check_combinations() (and
cfg80211_iter_combinations()) to have the beacon intervals for each
beaconing interface, and use that in order to match if a combination
fits, inside cfg80211_iter_combinations().
That new argument could be made the GCD of all existing beaconing
interfaces (or 0 if no such exists), since that's sufficient for
checking against a new min_gcd.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-12 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-31 13:26 [PATCH v8] cfg80211: Provision to allow the support for different beacon intervals Purushottam Kushwaha
2016-09-12 10:24 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2016-09-16 6:34 ` Undekari, Sunil Dutt
2016-09-27 13:02 ` Johannes Berg
2016-09-27 15:36 ` Undekari, Sunil Dutt
2016-09-28 11:21 ` Johannes Berg
2016-10-07 7:42 ` Kushwaha, Purushottam
2016-10-07 7:47 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1473675843.29016.18.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=amarnath@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jouni@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkushwah@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=usdutt@qti.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).