From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
"Pedersen, Thomas" <twp@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: cap 20MHz VHT bitrate at MCS 8
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:32:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475573532.5324.47.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57E01026.9030604@candelatech.com>
Sorry - needed some time to think through this thread again.
> I think it is a moot point as far as this change goes: Regardless of
> whether the NIC should or not, it _does_. So, mis-reporting it up
> the stack only hides the issue and does not even give the user a clue
> that on-the-air encoding may be slightly off-spec.
Arguably, reporting something that *seems* sane, like this patch does,
will do more to hide it than reporting 0 which is clearly bogus, no?
I realize you were replying to whether or not the *driver* should
"misreport" it, but the same argument applies the other way here, imho.
> If the on-air encoding is an issue, then we need to hack the firmware
> to disable this 'feature', but that is a completely separate issue.
I guess it trusts rate control enough to try, and if it cannot be
received by a spec-abiding receiver, it won't use it due to the
failures ... not such a big deal I guess, even though it's odd.
Does /anyone/ know why the spec disallowed it? Perhaps those "system"
people you refer to?
> Once this patch goes in, someone might consider properly reporting
> CCK rx rates for 5Ghz band too: ath10k can do this 'feature' as
> well, at least in some firmware. Probably can reproduce by sending
> off-channel mgt frames on 5Ghz when associated on 2.4, or something
> similar to this. I was using ath9k as sniffer when I found this long
> ago, so at least ath9k needs the change....
I don't see how this is related? It's not advertising those rates, so
it probably also can't use/report them as far as mac80211 and the rest
of the stack are concerned.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-04 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-06 19:00 [PATCH] cfg80211: cap 20MHz VHT bitrate at MCS 8 Thomas Pedersen
2016-09-06 19:07 ` Ben Greear
2016-09-07 18:20 ` Pedersen, Thomas
2016-09-12 6:43 ` Johannes Berg
2016-09-12 16:36 ` Ben Greear
2016-09-13 17:57 ` Pedersen, Thomas
2016-09-13 18:02 ` Johannes Berg
2016-09-16 18:31 ` Pedersen, Thomas
2016-09-19 9:00 ` Johannes Berg
2016-09-19 9:31 ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-09-19 16:19 ` Ben Greear
2016-10-04 9:32 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2016-10-04 16:31 ` Ben Greear
2016-10-13 12:52 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1475573532.5324.47.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=twp@qca.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).