From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: "Undekari, Sunil Dutt" <usdutt@qti.qualcomm.com>,
"Kushwaha, Purushottam" <pkushwah@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"Malinen, Jouni" <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com>,
"Hullur Subramanyam, Amarnath" <amarnath@qca.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cfg80211: Check radar_detect and num_different_channels with beacon interface combinations.
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:35:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1477316138.4085.19.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a1df5c048894351bbec2d502772b862@aphydexm01f.ap.qualcomm.com>
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 11:59 +0000, Undekari, Sunil Dutt wrote:
> >
> > I've just sent out a few patches that, I think, implement the
> > necessary validation for just the beacon intervals, without all
> > this extra baggage. Please take a look and let me know what you
> > think.
> I understand that the new patches from you are in consistent with the
> existing design of validating the radar detection / channels by
> having this validation done in the cfg80211 drivers through
> cfg80211_check_combinations.
Ok, so we agree here, that's good :)
> With this approach , wouldn't the existing cfg80211 drivers behave
> the other way ? I mean , with these commits and the current cfg80211
> drivers ( do not advertise beacon_int_min_gcd and invoke
> cfg80211_check_combinations) , the validation for the different
> beacon interval shall succeed , but the current kernel ( cfg80211
> interface ) with the same driver fails the start of the AP / mesh.
> Is it not breaking the backward compatibility ? Is this expected ?
Any driver that supports combinations should also invoke
check_combinations. This doesn't appear to be true for mwifiex, but
that's already a bug/problem in that driver, it doesn't really change
much?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-24 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 15:15 [PATCH v3] cfg80211: Check radar_detect and num_different_channels with beacon interface combinations Purushottam Kushwaha
2016-10-21 12:27 ` Johannes Berg
2016-10-24 11:59 ` Undekari, Sunil Dutt
2016-10-24 13:35 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2016-10-24 14:20 ` Undekari, Sunil Dutt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1477316138.4085.19.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=amarnath@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jouni@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkushwah@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=usdutt@qti.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).