From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>,
Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Cathy Luo <cluo@marvell.com>,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mwifiex: don't do unbalanced free()'ing in cleanup_if()
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:29:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1477524560-49226-1-git-send-email-briannorris@chromium.org> (raw)
The cleanup_if() callback is the inverse of init_if(). We allocate our
'card' interface structure in the probe() function, but we free it in
cleanup_if(). That gives a few problems:
(a) we leak this memory if probe() fails before we reach init_if()
(b) we can't safely utilize 'card' after cleanup_if() -- namely, in
remove() or suspend(), both of which might race with the cleanup
paths in our asynchronous FW initialization path
Solution: just use devm_kzalloc(), which will free this structure
properly when the device is removed -- and drop the set_drvdata(...,
NULL), since the driver core does this for us. This also removes the
temptation to use drvdata == NULL as a hack for checking if the device
has been "cleaned up."
I *do* leave the set_drvdata(..., NULL) for the hacky SDIO
mwifiex_recreate_adapter(), since the device core won't be able to clear
that one for us.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
---
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c | 5 +----
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c | 16 ++++++++++------
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/usb.c | 7 +------
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
index 063c707844d3..3047c1ab944a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static int mwifiex_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
pr_debug("info: vendor=0x%4.04X device=0x%4.04X rev=%d\n",
pdev->vendor, pdev->device, pdev->revision);
- card = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pcie_service_card), GFP_KERNEL);
+ card = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*card), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!card)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -2815,7 +2815,6 @@ static int mwifiex_pcie_init(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
err_set_dma_mask:
pci_disable_device(pdev);
err_enable_dev:
- pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
return ret;
}
@@ -2849,9 +2848,7 @@ static void mwifiex_pcie_cleanup(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
pci_disable_device(pdev);
pci_release_region(pdev, 2);
pci_release_region(pdev, 0);
- pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
}
- kfree(card);
}
static int mwifiex_pcie_request_irq(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c
index 8718950004f3..f04cf5a551b3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ mwifiex_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func, const struct sdio_device_id *id)
pr_debug("info: vendor=0x%4.04X device=0x%4.04X class=%d function=%d\n",
func->vendor, func->device, func->class, func->num);
- card = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sdio_mmc_card), GFP_KERNEL);
+ card = devm_kzalloc(&func->dev, sizeof(*card), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!card)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ mwifiex_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func, const struct sdio_device_id *id)
if (ret) {
dev_err(&func->dev, "failed to enable function\n");
- goto err_free;
+ return ret;
}
/* device tree node parsing and platform specific configuration*/
@@ -210,8 +210,6 @@ mwifiex_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func, const struct sdio_device_id *id)
sdio_claim_host(func);
sdio_disable_func(func);
sdio_release_host(func);
-err_free:
- kfree(card);
return ret;
}
@@ -2240,8 +2238,6 @@ static void mwifiex_cleanup_sdio(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
kfree(card->mpa_rx.len_arr);
kfree(card->mpa_tx.buf);
kfree(card->mpa_rx.buf);
- sdio_set_drvdata(card->func, NULL);
- kfree(card);
}
/*
@@ -2291,6 +2287,14 @@ static void mwifiex_recreate_adapter(struct sdio_mmc_card *card)
mwifiex_sdio_remove(func);
+ /*
+ * Normally, we would let the driver core take care of releasing these.
+ * But we're not letting the driver core handle this one. See above
+ * TODO.
+ */
+ sdio_set_drvdata(func, NULL);
+ devm_kfree(&func->dev, card);
+
/* power cycle the adapter */
sdio_claim_host(func);
mmc_hw_reset(func->card->host);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/usb.c
index 73eb0846db21..57ed834ba296 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/usb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/usb.c
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int mwifiex_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
struct usb_card_rec *card;
u16 id_vendor, id_product, bcd_device, bcd_usb;
- card = kzalloc(sizeof(struct usb_card_rec), GFP_KERNEL);
+ card = devm_kzalloc(&intf->dev, sizeof(*card), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!card)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -480,7 +480,6 @@ static int mwifiex_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: mwifiex_add_card failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
usb_reset_device(udev);
- kfree(card);
return ret;
}
@@ -630,11 +629,7 @@ static void mwifiex_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
"%s: removing card\n", __func__);
mwifiex_remove_card(adapter, &add_remove_card_sem);
- usb_set_intfdata(intf, NULL);
usb_put_dev(interface_to_usbdev(intf));
- kfree(card);
-
- return;
}
static struct usb_driver mwifiex_usb_driver = {
--
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-26 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-26 23:29 Brian Norris [this message]
2016-10-26 23:35 ` [PATCH] mwifiex: don't do unbalanced free()'ing in cleanup_if() Dmitry Torokhov
2016-10-26 23:43 ` Brian Norris
2016-10-26 23:52 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-11-18 11:25 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1477524560-49226-1-git-send-email-briannorris@chromium.org \
--to=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=akarwar@marvell.com \
--cc=cluo@marvell.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishants@marvell.com \
--cc=rajatja@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).