From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:53032 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966101AbcKKIvo (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 03:51:44 -0500 Message-ID: <1478854301.6101.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20161111_095157_443691_8FE45F6C) Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9CWireless?= usage of =?UTF-8?Q?pm-qos=E2=80=9D?= From: Johannes Berg To: Daniel Aleksandersen , Linux kernel wireless Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:51:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1478814972.2686901.784042113.31AFDC88@webmail.messagingengine.com> (sfid-20161110_225617_763917_DA906456) References: <1478814972.2686901.784042113.31AFDC88@webmail.messagingengine.com> (sfid-20161110_225617_763917_DA906456) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 22:56 +0100, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: > Hi, > > This patch from Johannes Berg removed the /dev/network_latency > system, right? > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=144483867919159&w=2 No, it didn't remove the system itself, just the use thereof in wireless. > So shouldn’t all the documentation be updated to indicate that it has > been removed? > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/pm-qos > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/ieee8021 > 1/power-savings Right, those should probably be removed. > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/power/pm_qos_interface.txt This still exists, even if it may have no users now - haven't checked. johannes