From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] nl80211: allow multiple active scheduled scan requests
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:59:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483523988.15591.9.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba1cb1a1-3d27-7421-47ea-a5625a886518@broadcom.com> (sfid-20170103_132539_473762_DA0FB5E7)
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 13:25 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 2-1-2017 11:44, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >
> > > + /*
> > > + * allow only one legacy scheduled scan if user-space
> > > + * does not indicate multiple scheduled scan support.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_SCHED_SCAN_MULTI] &&
> > > + cfg80211_legacy_sched_scan_active(rdev))
> > > return -EINPROGRESS;
> >
> > That probably doesn't go far enough - if legacy one is active then
> > we
> > probably shouldn't allow a new MULTI one either (or abandon the
> > legacy
> > one) so that older userspace doesn't get confused with multiple
> > notifications from sched scans it didn't start.
>
> I considered that although not taking the notifications into account.
> Will change it. Abandoning the legacy one would be a behavioral
> change so probably not acceptable, right?
Well, it would be acceptable since it's documented that it's possible
it might stop for any reason. However, we need to prefer something -
always preferring the new sched scan could lead to bounces, so we can
prefer (1) existing, (2) legacy-single type or (3) new-multi type, but
not (4) new sched scan.
I think preferring the existing would probably be best, i.e. refuse
legacy if any sched scan is running, and refuse multi if legacy is
running?
> I guess your remark means this clarifies your earlier question about
> the request id, right?
yeah.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-04 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-16 22:47 [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal dimitrysh
2016-11-17 20:56 ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-11-18 23:53 ` Dmitry Shmidt
2016-11-22 7:24 ` Luca Coelho
2016-11-22 17:29 ` Dmitry Shmidt
2016-11-22 20:41 ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-11-22 20:54 ` Dmitry Shmidt
2016-11-23 8:43 ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-11-28 19:25 ` Dmitry Shmidt
2016-12-05 14:28 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-05 18:32 ` Dmitry Shmidt
2016-12-07 6:44 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-07 18:39 ` Dmitry Shmidt
2016-12-07 20:51 ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-12-08 22:35 ` Dmitry Shmidt
2016-12-09 11:10 ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-12-13 16:06 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-03 20:45 ` Dmitry Shmidt
2017-01-04 13:28 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-04 20:32 ` Dmitry Shmidt
2017-01-05 11:46 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-05 13:39 ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-01-05 13:44 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-05 19:59 ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-01-09 10:48 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-09 12:07 ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-01-11 13:14 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-05 20:45 ` Dmitry Shmidt
2017-01-09 10:45 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-09 11:19 ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-12-13 16:04 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-21 10:20 ` [RFC] nl80211: allow multiple active scheduled scan requests Arend van Spriel
2017-01-02 10:44 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-03 12:25 ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-01-04 9:59 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2017-01-04 10:20 ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-01-04 10:30 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-04 10:34 ` Arend Van Spriel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1483523988.15591.9.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=dimitrysh@google.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).