From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Andrew Zaborowski <andrew.zaborowski@intel.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cfg80211: Accept multiple RSSI thresholds for CQM
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:44:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485251062.7244.10.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOq732JhLoeMQSwadM=ReBv7gAy9zb1uQ9RZAzEtvyDo7je+ww@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20170107_104335_299116_3D4EAE6E)
On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 04:43 -0500, Andrew Zaborowski wrote:
> With the basic mac80211 implementation in my patch 4/4 this feature
> should be set when IEEE80211_VIF_BEACON_FILTER is not set. The
> problem with a nl80211_ext_feature is that it's per wiphy instead of
> per interface. So in the case mac80211, it would need to be set if
> all interfaces can accept lists of thresholds and that can change
> dynamically as interfaces are added. And nl80211 has no per-
> interface features.
Right - it doesn't even have that concept, and I'm not sure that really
makes sense.
> I wonder if it's better to add a ieee80211_hw_flags flag to advertise
> this feature per wiphy, or, as an approximation, set the flag based
> on the default interface that is created in ieee80211_register_hw.
I think we should just leave the new flag up to the driver then. The
only driver using per-interface beacon filtering (iwlwifi, afaik) will
either need to convert to actually handle it in the beacon filtering
case (which is the normal case anyway).
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-24 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-12 1:52 [PATCH v2 2/4] cfg80211: Pass new RSSI level in CQM RSSI notification Andrew Zaborowski
2016-12-12 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cfg80211: Accept multiple RSSI thresholds for CQM Andrew Zaborowski
2017-01-04 15:53 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-04 20:19 ` Andrew Zaborowski
2017-01-05 11:49 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-07 9:43 ` Andrew Zaborowski
2017-01-24 9:44 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2016-12-12 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mac80211: Add set_cqm_rssi_range_config Andrew Zaborowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1485251062.7244.10.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=andrew.zaborowski@intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).