Re: Need support for Intel new wifi module 9462NGW

[Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>]

Here are the links to v2 of the last two patches, please try with these
instead (keep the first one that you already have):

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10060837/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10060839/

--
Cheers,
Luca.


On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 08:46 +0200, Luca Coelho wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 14:39 +0800, Chris Chiu wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Chris,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 11:11 +0800, Chris Chiu wrote:
> > > > Hi Luca,
> > > >     Any suggestion for the "Failed to start INIT ucode: -110"
> > > > issue
> > > > for the firmware?
> > > 
> > > There were a few problems which should now be fixed.  We
> > > published
> > > new
> > > firmwares in our linux-firmware.git tree[1] and also made some
> > > fixes in
> > > the driver[2].  Please update your system accordingly and let me
> > > know
> > > if it works for you.
> > > 
> > > Thanks!
> > > 
> > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/linux
> > > -f
> > > irmware.git/
> > > [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10059871/
> > >     https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10059875/
> > >     https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10059873/
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Luca.
> > 
> > Hi Luca,
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> 
> >     Thanks for your patch and updated firmware. The driver can
> > initialize w/o error now. However, it always fails on ip-config
> > after
> > 4-way handshake complete. I have to mention that I removed the
> > field
> > ".soc_latency" in all new iwl_cfg you added in
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10059875/ to remove compile
> > error
> > based on the linux mainline 4.14.
> >     I don't know whether if this causes the problem. Do you need me
> > to
> > do anything for more information?
> 
> That was my fault, I forgot to include one file in my commit.  I have
> sent v2 of the two last patches to solve the problem.  Can you try
> them?
> 
> The problem you're seeing could be related to that, because we use a
> bit longer wait period for HW stabilization with integrated devices. 
> And if you remove it, you may encounter random problems...
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> Luca.