linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com
Cc: kvalo@codeaurora.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxwifi <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: pull-request: iwlwifi 2017-11-19
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 10:20:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511943649.4827.20.camel@coelho.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUVPzwX6hyPZaUJWwn7zOGMaRAkQ7SA6haw6p0F-YX7kBw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 08:51 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 10:30 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
> > > wrote:
> > > [..]
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ---
> > > > iwlwifi: first set of fixes for 4.15
> > > > 
> > > > * Support new FW API version of scan cmd (used in FW version
> > > > 34);
> > > 
> > > While seeing this...
> > > I have here a iwlwifi-8265 hardware and have seen a recently
> > > uploaded
> > > FW-version 34 in iwlwifi-firmware Git.
> > > Can you explain the dependence of iwlwifi firmware-version /
> > > Linux
> > > kernel-release and especially probing?
> > > Currently, I am using Linux v4.14 from Debian/experimental.
> > 
> > Mostly for backwards-compatibility, the driver is able to work with
> > a
> > range of firmware versions.  It only uses one of them at a time
> > (i.e.
> > the highest supported version it finds).
> > 
> > The driver in v4.14 support version 34 and below.  So it starts
> > looking
> > for that one and, if not found, falls back to the next lower
> > version
> > (i.e. 33) and so on, until it finds one.
> > 
> 
> Isn't Linux v4.14.3 (here: -rc1) minimum to completely support new
> features in v34 firmware?

Yes, it is.  But this was a bug and we can't go back and fix v4.14.0-2, 
right? So it's the best we can do and whoever is using v4.14, should
update to v4.14.3 when it comes out to be able to use version 34 of the
firmware.


--
Cheers,
Luca.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-29  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-20 11:02 pull-request: iwlwifi 2017-11-19 Luca Coelho
2017-11-20 15:47 ` Kalle Valo
2017-11-21  9:30 ` Sedat Dilek
2017-11-21 10:10   ` Luca Coelho
2017-11-21 10:42     ` Kalle Valo
2017-11-21 11:37       ` Luca Coelho
2017-11-22 19:46         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-11-22 20:50           ` Luca Coelho
2017-11-23 19:08             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-11-29  7:51     ` Sedat Dilek
2017-11-29  8:20       ` Luca Coelho [this message]
2017-12-19 13:52         ` Sedat Dilek
2017-12-19 15:13           ` Luca Coelho

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1511943649.4827.20.camel@coelho.fi \
    --to=luca@coelho.fi \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxwifi@intel.com \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).