From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0100.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.100]:35674 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751891AbeCXMtf (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:49:35 -0400 Message-ID: <1521895769.24655.10.camel@perches.com> (sfid-20180324_134939_624352_60A7F8B3) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] wireless: Use octal not symbolic permissions From: Joe Perches To: Kalle Valo Cc: Jiri Slaby , Nick Kossifidis , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , QCA ath9k Development , Christian Lamparter , Eugene Krasnikov , Stanislav Yakovlev , Stanislaw Gruszka , Johannes Berg , Emmanuel Grumbach , Luca Coelho , Intel Linux Wireless , Jakub Kicinski , Helmut Schaa , Solomon Peachy , Matthias Brugger , Arend van Spriel , Franky Lin , Hante Meuleman , Chi-Hsien Lin , Wright Feng , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.ke Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 05:49:29 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87zi2xss27.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> References: <87zi2xss27.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2018-03-24 at 12:09 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Joe Perches writes: > > Prefer the direct use of octal for permissions. [] > I don't know what tree are you planning to send these to, but I would > prefer to take this to wireless-drivers-next to minimise any conflicts. Fine by me. Done against -next.