From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Balaji Pothunoori <bpothuno@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cfg80211: last ack signal support in station dump
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 22:51:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1529355107.3092.46.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72bc5a1b5136eb30baba715f891961f1@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 14:48 +0530, Balaji Pothunoori wrote:
> On 2018-06-15 17:11, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 19:41 +0530, Balaji Pothunoori wrote:
> > >
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/nl80211.h
> > > @@ -3000,8 +3000,8 @@ enum nl80211_sta_bss_param {
> > > * received from the station (u64, usec)
> > > * @NL80211_STA_INFO_PAD: attribute used for padding for 64-bit
> > > alignment
> > > * @NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL: signal strength of the last ACK
> > > frame(u8, dBm)
> > > - * @NL80211_STA_INFO_DATA_ACK_SIGNAL_AVG: avg signal strength of
> > > (data)
> > > - * ACK frame (s8, dBm)
> > > + * @NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL_AVG: avg signal strength of data or
> > > management
> > > + * ACK frames(s8, dBm)
> > > * @__NL80211_STA_INFO_AFTER_LAST: internal
> > > * @NL80211_STA_INFO_MAX: highest possible station info attribute
> > > */
> > > @@ -3041,7 +3041,7 @@ enum nl80211_sta_info {
> > > NL80211_STA_INFO_RX_DURATION,
> > > NL80211_STA_INFO_PAD,
> > > NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL,
> > > - NL80211_STA_INFO_DATA_ACK_SIGNAL_AVG,
> > > + NL80211_STA_INFO_ACK_SIGNAL_AVG,
> >
> > Wait, what happened here? You can't remove old API.
>
> Here is my intention is to make the unique average ack signal and last
> ack signal
> support in station dump irrespective of data or management tx ack
> packet.
> Do you want me to add a new API for management tx ack packet?
Well, you can't remove old API.
And the data-ACK was explicitly added because of concerns about signal
varying a lot with MCS, so ACK signal is more reliable.
I suppose the original use here didn't really *need* just *data* ACK, so
perhaps we can redefine it - you'd know better? After all, you defined
the old API :-))
But still, you can't just remove it. I think we're probably OK to
redefine it but then you need to keep API compatibility by adding the
necessary defines.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-18 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-04 14:11 [PATCH v2 0/2] cfg80211/mac80211: last ack signal support in station dump Balaji Pothunoori
2018-06-04 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cfg80211: " Balaji Pothunoori
2018-06-15 11:41 ` Johannes Berg
2018-06-18 9:18 ` Balaji Pothunoori
2018-06-18 20:51 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2018-06-04 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mac80211: " Balaji Pothunoori
2018-06-15 11:43 ` Johannes Berg
2018-06-18 10:25 ` Balaji Pothunoori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1529355107.3092.46.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=bpothuno@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).