From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.63.242]:35188 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932236AbeGFLiU (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 07:38:20 -0400 Message-ID: <1530877097.3197.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20180706_133824_088544_32A69DB4) Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] cfg80211: Accept multiple RSSI threholds for STA_MON command From: Johannes Berg To: Tamizh chelvam Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 13:38:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0b97dd04efa70ff1016ae6fd2face3a1@codeaurora.org> References: <1528886747-26342-1-git-send-email-tamizhr@codeaurora.org> <1528886747-26342-7-git-send-email-tamizhr@codeaurora.org> <1530265167.3481.45.camel@sipsolutions.net> <0b97dd04efa70ff1016ae6fd2face3a1@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 13:07 +0530, Tamizh chelvam wrote: > First I've done patch to have single threshold value for AP mode and as > per the previous discussion extended to multiple thresholds also. Here > the intention is to accept one or more than one RSSI thresholds to > monitor. Any thought ? Is there any point in even offering the API for a single one though? I mean - we only implement it in mac80211 now, and there we clearly implement multiple, so single would never be used. Like I said: > > Or do you expect somebody to actually really need the single threshold > > in the near future? johannes