From: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
To: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
"openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org"
<openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: ath10k mesh + ap + encryption?
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:13:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15353347.MUgkgiNHdu@prime> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h99kjca5.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2398 bytes --]
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 10:59:31 AM CEST Valo, Kalle wrote:
> Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de> writes:
> > we have done some experiments last week on ath10k, trying to run mesh
> > (802.11s) and access point at the same time, both encrypted.
> >
> > We have tested a recent LEDE (reboot-1519-g42f559e) but with
> > firmware-5.bin_10.2.4.70.42-2 and the included wpa_supplicant, which gave
> > us a working encrypted 802.11s network. However, starting an AP at the
> > same time didn't work (AP doesn't beacon). This wasn't a problem when
> > 802.11s was running unencrypted.
> >
> > We also tested version 10.2.4.97 (from codeaurora), which is now default
> > in
> > LEDE. However, this version apparently doesn't support 11s mesh at all
> > (WMI_SERVICE_MESH_11S is disabled in the service map, but cfg/mac80211
> > advertises support).
> >
> > So here are my questions:
> > * Did anyone succesfully run AP and mesh, both encrypted at the same
> > time?
> > * Do you have any pointers how we could fix this? Could it be fixable in
> > the>
> > driver (i.e. not in firmware)?
> >
> > * Does anyone have an idea if 11s will be supported in future versions? I
> >
> > didn't find any changelogs, but having 11s mode no longer in the service
> > map does not make me optimistic.
>
> Why is LEDE using 10.2.4.97? It seems to be a quite old release and I
> have no knowledge if anyone even tests that firmware branch with ath10k.
> I recommend to only use firmware releases from ath10k-firmware.git as we
> use those internally with ath10k. In any case, don't make any
> assumptions about future from that firmware branch as it's so old.
This was introduced in December 25th, 2015 after some firmware-related
problems. I'm CC'ing Martin Blumenstingl who suggested this change.
Since then, ath10k is pulling firmware from here (unless ct firmware is used):
https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/qsdk/oss/firmware/ath10k-firmware/plain/
10.2.4/firmware-5.bin_10.2.4.97-1
However, I don't understand the numbering? 10.2.4.97 > 10.2.4.70, but you say
10.2.4.70.42-2 is more recent? I would have assumed otherwise from the
numbers. However, 10.2.4.70 has much more sub-revisions. Is there any document
describing the revisions? I don't understand it at least from this wiki page
[1].
Thanks!
Simon
[1] https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath10k/firmware
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-13 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-13 8:00 ath10k mesh + ap + encryption? Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-13 10:59 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-13 11:13 ` Simon Wunderlich [this message]
2016-09-13 11:25 ` Valo, Kalle
2016-09-13 11:38 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2016-09-13 12:30 ` Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-13 17:54 ` Pedersen, Thomas
2016-09-19 6:43 ` Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-19 9:34 ` [OpenWrt-Devel] " Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-24 16:41 ` Sven Eckelmann
2016-09-23 22:18 ` Pedersen, Thomas
2016-09-25 20:16 ` Simon Wunderlich
2016-09-13 18:54 ` Martin Blumenstingl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15353347.MUgkgiNHdu@prime \
--to=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).