From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:43568 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726219AbeIEQO0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 12:14:26 -0400 Message-ID: <1536147865.3528.14.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20180905_134437_326751_43C1DABF) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: TDLS: fix skb queue/priority assignment From: Johannes Berg To: Toke =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: Felix Fietkau Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 13:44:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1536147683.3528.12.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20180905_134134_899874_E6692541) References: <20180905113402.7665-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <1536147453.3528.11.camel@sipsolutions.net> <87k1o05g04.fsf@toke.dk> <1536147683.3528.12.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20180905_134134_899874_E6692541) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 13:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 13:40 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > > > > Guess we'll have to deal with everything else if we ever move management > > frames onto the TXQ path as well... > > Depends on whether we care for management frame priorities or not ... so > far we haven't really. Actually, for the most part we have implemented that properly. Except for the TXQ I added for bufferable management ... oh well, I think we're the only user thereof now. I'm not sure we want to have a TXQ per TID for management, that seems overkill. But I'm also not sure how to solve this otherwise ... johannes