linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How many null-data probes on connection loss?
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:38:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1537951137.28767.5.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a1447d9-9a61-dc2d-0101-33c6bdeb946f@candelatech.com> (sfid-20180926_011302_681374_72D229A5)

On Tue, 2018-09-25 at 16:12 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> While testing out some other issue, I noticed that my ath10k system creates
> several hundred null-data probes when I abruptly down the AP the station
> is connected to.
> 
> I guess this is because I use the mac80211 stack to handle the probes, and
> the firmware then retries each mac80211 probe many times.
> 
> So, in the case where mac80211 is sending a null-data probe, is the assumption
> that the driver will try each frame exactly once?

Not really, it should be treated like any other management frame.

> Or is several hundred frames expected?  I'm guessing the former, but before I go
> hacking firmware, I thought I would ask...

Certainly not several hundred, but maybe a dozen? I think iwlwifi uses
16, and minstrel would set up max_rate_tries, which drivers set to
somewhere between 1 and 18? One seems s a bit low, mt76?

johannes

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-26  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-25 23:12 How many null-data probes on connection loss? Ben Greear
2018-09-26  8:38 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2018-09-26 18:04   ` Ben Greear
2018-09-26 18:26     ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-26 18:47       ` Ben Greear
2018-09-26 18:48         ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-26 18:53           ` Ben Greear
2018-09-26 22:21           ` Ben Greear
2018-09-27  7:12             ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-27 15:32               ` Ben Greear
2018-09-28  7:19                 ` Johannes Berg
2018-09-28 15:14                   ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1537951137.28767.5.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).