From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF92C282CE for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 04:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB38E20851 for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 04:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eero.com header.i=@eero.com header.b="Yhv1YHJe" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725859AbfEYEQ0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 May 2019 00:16:26 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f196.google.com ([209.85.214.196]:41959 "EHLO mail-pl1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725843AbfEYEQ0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 May 2019 00:16:26 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f196.google.com with SMTP id f12so4905947plt.8 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 21:16:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eero.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=VdDQH+QybpJuQuwob6y4AAaL3QBAr+372aK8MmZ7O3c=; b=Yhv1YHJeSa2rVx3RxNjoi7Gj/Knj/WAD+KiLlaRKcKldFBQ5L3gHvHVSaDN6NKA4Am RadWzBUWODwpFhfDomQvJb5o6tIKPRk0y1U5VjupoW0536exU09AM6uyHobDJ/sD6nO/ EJAK8lmW6gvz5GK401IKkvMTxFGZSA/CzTXww= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=VdDQH+QybpJuQuwob6y4AAaL3QBAr+372aK8MmZ7O3c=; b=f3oiGsm2BTzrl+yYUGO8p3yRfrkVRy2eflS637iPYLBDImoCvqJ3g8l82FJYSm6TB0 tTFQXvN50bdOIxODKpdVaxzhwaV9HkqW3EmCvRDsLYzEIRouA/ydatUXIHY7VsVPF9Va A5RqU4PiK+jPTh+HPU7abLA50nmYuOKxdrJWNq8Cd+qL3XKlzsd8n5h3Y8PdgS1s1bGH jMy9/rsAzAEvczY2V16WXVBnaG/l9V+WD8rO1smPwH4EJWUafB+9QcjmZKCOsdsA7np+ zm2VtXmFrcW4ez9TjO+Y7NBnkpVX1o+kS/EVarrfz7zizVu6zkjhYhB/Z0I+WzbMEinn bIXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVlpi8XnkmYkoqa9YqVEONvf0UYL8gjUYJNezfJsVsKUfbCYvzZ gJOlAPQyjlCxyr0iezIX1cCJdg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxk7cbIvomWGFWxcrCA4sIDn0X+FSQSY0mYo184t35gJazAbmxtBZAxUX0zZT+uccyxskDa+A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e00a:: with SMTP id ca10mr113298356plb.18.1558757785576; Fri, 24 May 2019 21:16:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uf8ac7dbfedf154.ant.amazon.com (c-73-158-126-35.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.158.126.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z11sm5086742pfg.187.2019.05.24.21.16.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 May 2019 21:16:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Pedersen To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Pedersen Subject: [PATCH v2] mac80211: mesh: fix RCU warning Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 21:16:24 -0700 Message-Id: <1558757784-23179-1-git-send-email-thomas@eero.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org ifmsh->csa is an RCU-protected pointer. The writer context in ieee80211_mesh_finish_csa() is already mutually exclusive with wdev->sdata.mtx, but the RCU checker did not know this. Use rcu_dereference_protected() to avoid a warning. fixes the following warning: [ 12.519089] ============================= [ 12.520042] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 12.520652] 5.1.0-rc7-wt+ #16 Tainted: G W [ 12.521409] ----------------------------- [ 12.521972] net/mac80211/mesh.c:1223 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 12.522928] other info that might help us debug this: [ 12.523984] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 12.524855] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:2/152: [ 12.525438] #0: 00000000057be08c ((wq_completion)phy0){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1a2/0x620 [ 12.526607] #1: 0000000059c6b07a ((work_completion)(&sdata->csa_finalize_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1a2/0x620 [ 12.528001] #2: 00000000f184ba7d (&wdev->mtx){+.+.}, at: ieee80211_csa_finalize_work+0x2f/0x90 [ 12.529116] #3: 00000000831a1f54 (&local->mtx){+.+.}, at: ieee80211_csa_finalize_work+0x47/0x90 [ 12.530233] #4: 00000000fd06f988 (&local->chanctx_mtx){+.+.}, at: ieee80211_csa_finalize_work+0x51/0x90 Signed-off-by: Thomas Pedersen --- v2: rcu_read_lock() doesn't make sense. Use rcu_dereference_protected() (Johannes) --- net/mac80211/mesh.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/mac80211/mesh.c b/net/mac80211/mesh.c index 766e5e5..d5aba50 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/mesh.c +++ b/net/mac80211/mesh.c @@ -1220,7 +1220,8 @@ int ieee80211_mesh_finish_csa(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata) ifmsh->chsw_ttl = 0; /* Remove the CSA and MCSP elements from the beacon */ - tmp_csa_settings = rcu_dereference(ifmsh->csa); + tmp_csa_settings = rcu_dereference_protected(ifmsh->csa, + lockdep_is_held(&sdata->wdev.mtx)); RCU_INIT_POINTER(ifmsh->csa, NULL); if (tmp_csa_settings) kfree_rcu(tmp_csa_settings, rcu_head); @@ -1242,6 +1243,8 @@ int ieee80211_mesh_csa_beacon(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, struct mesh_csa_settings *tmp_csa_settings; int ret = 0; + lockdep_assert_held(&sdata->wdev.mtx); + tmp_csa_settings = kmalloc(sizeof(*tmp_csa_settings), GFP_ATOMIC); if (!tmp_csa_settings) -- 2.7.4