From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81137C48BD5 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8062133F for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com header.i=@broadcom.com header.b="nvX3W/78" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729578AbfFYLPf (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:15:35 -0400 Received: from rnd-relay.smtp.broadcom.com ([192.19.229.170]:44900 "EHLO rnd-relay.smtp.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728773AbfFYLPf (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:15:35 -0400 Received: from mail-irv-17.broadcom.com (mail-irv-17.lvn.broadcom.net [10.75.224.233]) by rnd-relay.smtp.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3073430C009; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 04:10:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 rnd-relay.smtp.broadcom.com 3073430C009 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=broadcom.com; s=dkimrelay; t=1561461031; bh=gaOlaNzDs92SPfiE5cFW9fbJpfQKUwXR9yLVoXOFWoE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nvX3W/78oqpT+rSygYtR0mRkp/55NvMfPWDdKk2SPPYmSS1uQ/F0ALCSAsVnwpEti +JNHhyM+a1qL/v5zbs+tLoo8IaZe+Wg1oX/arHXdmtfxqRHhUuizvVJtPi6jhDPK7s 7rnId0SIRd2wjQehqOf+G18CKdF7wqrqdF0BWT04= Received: from bld-bun-01.bun.broadcom.com (bld-bun-01.bun.broadcom.com [10.176.128.83]) by mail-irv-17.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A43560D34; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 04:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bld-bun-01.bun.broadcom.com (Postfix, from userid 25152) id CCD4CB02B44; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:10:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Arend van Spriel To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Arend van Spriel Subject: [RFC V2 8/8] cfg80211: apply same mandatory rate flags for 5GHz and 6GHz Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:10:27 +0200 Message-Id: <1561461027-10793-9-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1561461027-10793-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> References: <1561461027-10793-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org For the new 6GHz band the same rules apply for mandatory rates so add it to set_mandatory_flags_band() function. Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts Reviewed-by: Leon Zegers Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel --- net/wireless/util.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c index 4462837..f0558e7 100644 --- a/net/wireless/util.c +++ b/net/wireless/util.c @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ static void set_mandatory_flags_band(struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband) switch (sband->band) { case NL80211_BAND_5GHZ: + case NL80211_BAND_6GHZ: want = 3; for (i = 0; i < sband->n_bitrates; i++) { if (sband->bitrates[i].bitrate == 60 || -- 1.9.1