From: "Chuck Crisler" <ccrisler@vgocom.com>
To: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: active vs. passive scans
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:03:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15713CDD627C41D39E4B9725AE2B241D@ChuckPC> (raw)
How to you get the supplicant/linux wireless to perform active scans rather
than passive scans? Are active scans faster?
Thank you,
Chuck
next reply other threads:[~2010-09-27 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-27 14:03 Chuck Crisler [this message]
2010-09-27 15:06 ` active vs. passive scans Luciano Coelho
2010-09-27 15:09 ` Johannes Berg
2010-09-27 16:32 ` Luciano Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15713CDD627C41D39E4B9725AE2B241D@ChuckPC \
--to=ccrisler@vgocom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).