linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marlon Smith <marlon.smith10@gmail.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange performance issue when using two devices at once
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:22:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1580325769.26012.54.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e80a485-892d-3b29-19c7-38a9caa14f4b@candelatech.com>

On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 10:42 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 1/29/20 10:39 AM, Marlon Smith wrote:
> > 
> > Hi everyone,
> > 
> > I have two RT5370 devices connected to the same access point. Both
> > devices are very slow, but the instant I disconnect one device, the
> > other speeds up by a factor of 10.
> Out of curiosity, are both of the RT5370 used on the same client
> device?
> > Did you check that they have unique MAC addresses?
> > Thanks,
> Ben
> > > 
> > 
> > The really strange part is that one device will perform slowly even
> > if
> > the other device is basically idle! I've confirmed this with a
> > packet
> > sniffer.
> > 
> > I've been trying to do some debugging, and I've found that when
> > both
> > devices are connected to the access point, they report a large
> > number
> > of duplicate frames. I added some debug output
> > in ieee80211_rx_h_check_dup() to confirm that this only happens
> > while
> > both devices are connected. The packet sniffer also shows a large
> > number of retries while this is occurring.
> > 
> > Using backports 5.3-rc4 for this, but also tested on 4.14-rc2.
> > 
> > I did post about this previously on this mailing list (RT5370
> > performance issues), but I thought I'd post again with this new
> > information and more descriptive title. I'm a little bit stuck on
> > this
> > for a while now, so any ideas are much appreciated.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Marlon
> > 

They are on separate devices, although the mac addresses are close.
70:F1:1C:2E:AF:B4 and
70:F1:1C:2E:AF:B6.

However, I have a third device 70:F1:1C:2E:AF:BB which performs well
and does not affect the performance of the other two.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-29 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-29 18:39 Strange performance issue when using two devices at once Marlon Smith
2020-01-29 18:42 ` Ben Greear
2020-01-29 19:22   ` Marlon Smith [this message]
2020-01-29 19:27     ` Ben Greear
2020-01-29 19:48       ` Marlon Smith
2020-01-29 20:01         ` Ben Greear
2020-01-29 20:49           ` Marlon Smith
2020-01-30 14:43           ` Marlon Smith
2020-01-30 15:32             ` Felix Fietkau
2020-01-30 16:04               ` Marlon Smith
2020-01-30 14:55 ` Jean-Pierre TOSONI
2020-01-30 15:26   ` Marlon Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1580325769.26012.54.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=marlon.smith10@gmail.com \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).