From: Marlon Smith <marlon.smith10@gmail.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange performance issue when using two devices at once
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:22:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1580325769.26012.54.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e80a485-892d-3b29-19c7-38a9caa14f4b@candelatech.com>
On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 10:42 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 1/29/20 10:39 AM, Marlon Smith wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have two RT5370 devices connected to the same access point. Both
> > devices are very slow, but the instant I disconnect one device, the
> > other speeds up by a factor of 10.
> Out of curiosity, are both of the RT5370 used on the same client
> device?
> > Did you check that they have unique MAC addresses?
> > Thanks,
> Ben
> > >
> >
> > The really strange part is that one device will perform slowly even
> > if
> > the other device is basically idle! I've confirmed this with a
> > packet
> > sniffer.
> >
> > I've been trying to do some debugging, and I've found that when
> > both
> > devices are connected to the access point, they report a large
> > number
> > of duplicate frames. I added some debug output
> > in ieee80211_rx_h_check_dup() to confirm that this only happens
> > while
> > both devices are connected. The packet sniffer also shows a large
> > number of retries while this is occurring.
> >
> > Using backports 5.3-rc4 for this, but also tested on 4.14-rc2.
> >
> > I did post about this previously on this mailing list (RT5370
> > performance issues), but I thought I'd post again with this new
> > information and more descriptive title. I'm a little bit stuck on
> > this
> > for a while now, so any ideas are much appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Marlon
> >
They are on separate devices, although the mac addresses are close.
70:F1:1C:2E:AF:B4 and
70:F1:1C:2E:AF:B6.
However, I have a third device 70:F1:1C:2E:AF:BB which performs well
and does not affect the performance of the other two.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-29 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-29 18:39 Strange performance issue when using two devices at once Marlon Smith
2020-01-29 18:42 ` Ben Greear
2020-01-29 19:22 ` Marlon Smith [this message]
2020-01-29 19:27 ` Ben Greear
2020-01-29 19:48 ` Marlon Smith
2020-01-29 20:01 ` Ben Greear
2020-01-29 20:49 ` Marlon Smith
2020-01-30 14:43 ` Marlon Smith
2020-01-30 15:32 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-01-30 16:04 ` Marlon Smith
2020-01-30 14:55 ` Jean-Pierre TOSONI
2020-01-30 15:26 ` Marlon Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1580325769.26012.54.camel@gmail.com \
--to=marlon.smith10@gmail.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).