From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6DFC2D0DB for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 19:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A832F20716 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 19:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="obTWgWhk" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727133AbgA2Tss (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:48:48 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f181.google.com ([209.85.222.181]:41606 "EHLO mail-qk1-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726251AbgA2Tsr (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:48:47 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f181.google.com with SMTP id s187so478503qke.8 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:48:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=slc3rWpEf3WGPbJ6YA984NeYUtj+x1rmoMByNZMYNcM=; b=obTWgWhkdWWKXC+hcBpIfb2/ReJ2ZeiPAlMweFC3IBzDdYii27Pg5bVWbSjNVz+tDM Vl26u1EhsdlG2HzKXaJeKC5/86yaIFWyAJxIovF2QI0GPFSh4mHwkXAabgTjoIwYiFkB CcH8AvZV4OjuaEX7yJUisOzB5FooY4dVkvnF7LmoHWB+G/c24mQ8a5V48jaoQ+izBm56 uIMccTRzRu5zfk1g7H3CIoGRMBMinq66IXSybayzfadZ+Nf6B1d1awi5aklx8DRm15Na A6eoqAF18M+uZOd3NSOG3wiTDe+vpA9VBj+OnW6R0bKzpL29QDYZlqt99i8fuuGh0l6R L+ZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=slc3rWpEf3WGPbJ6YA984NeYUtj+x1rmoMByNZMYNcM=; b=OSBUUBsUwKDeGcAO53yll9eZJpbPaGbojOLcz8oHYCBHim0WmFO5xo+kSJONSmUdXn W7JAuCxwbnmjfvtGZLZhpmhhKSOBRxSaZUa5vbasvMG70liK/FASW4YydCxAJpyc/pdu BJJRCLqv3cE4yuwECI+kCYFyrnMA4wi0gOqAE65l8iyaBgrNfFaKEJUEvP0cRXep8FEW CXgvUL9mGvQBe7F0mW7DPIkj5hTtgkjzwMjp10j9NNBVbFKnZlON9kx+TbvSoleykIni zJYnCqKp83v4scg4MUYWu8ZLsEu1wDlONEHGOdzU5NzuRdT0n8nhEVmGWRxNEFrMAinC 0rYw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUhBB0py5p/9fNO1w3UVjQcjt9OrNr4/odQSpEVbEmht1VHIE6c Ey0vFIvqeB1Pv6gYVWtsMb6nW0zU X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwjhjXU+pqz2arMHdthwDBJZZ6aN3n07VdwxlebTqnWv8kpCDuZj/tjytJMrLrt3ai1Q4M+AA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:a390:: with SMTP id m138mr1380715qke.23.1580327326591; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:48:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (dhcp-108-168-58-21.cable.user.start.ca. [108.168.58.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o17sm1561199qtq.93.2020.01.29.11.48.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:48:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1580327314.26012.59.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Strange performance issue when using two devices at once From: Marlon Smith To: Ben Greear , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:48:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6bcff97c-3b9b-7fa9-5101-80aca367ff84@candelatech.com> References: <1580323191.26012.48.camel@gmail.com> <2e80a485-892d-3b29-19c7-38a9caa14f4b@candelatech.com> <1580325769.26012.54.camel@gmail.com> <6bcff97c-3b9b-7fa9-5101-80aca367ff84@candelatech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 11:27 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > On 1/29/20 11:22 AM, Marlon Smith wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 10:42 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > > > > > > On 1/29/20 10:39 AM, Marlon Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > I have two RT5370 devices connected to the same access point. > > > > Both > > > > devices are very slow, but the instant I disconnect one device, > > > > the > > > > other speeds up by a factor of 10. > > > Out of curiosity, are both of the RT5370 used on the same client > > > device? > > > > > > > > Did you check that they have unique MAC addresses? > > > > Thanks, > > > Ben > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The really strange part is that one device will perform slowly > > > > even > > > > if > > > > the other device is basically idle! I've confirmed this with a > > > > packet > > > > sniffer. > > > > > > > > I've been trying to do some debugging, and I've found that when > > > > both > > > > devices are connected to the access point, they report a large > > > > number > > > > of duplicate frames. I added some debug output > > > > inĀ ieee80211_rx_h_check_dup() to confirm that this only happens > > > > while > > > > both devices are connected. The packet sniffer also shows a > > > > large > > > > number of retries while this is occurring. > > > > > > > > Using backports 5.3-rc4 for this, but also tested on 4.14-rc2. > > > > > > > > I did post about this previously on this mailing list (RT5370 > > > > performance issues), but I thought I'd post again with this new > > > > information and more descriptive title. I'm a little bit stuck > > > > on > > > > this > > > > for a while now, so any ideas are much appreciated. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Marlon > > > > > > They are on separate devices, although the mac addresses are close. > > 70:F1:1C:2E:AF:B4 and > > 70:F1:1C:2E:AF:B6. > > > > However, I have a third deviceĀ 70:F1:1C:2E:AF:BB which performs > > well > > and does not affect the performance of the other two. > > > Have you tried a different AP? > > And also tried using the exact same MAC addresses configured on a > different > radio (like ath9k)? > > Thanks, > Ben > > I have tried a different access point in a different environment but no luck. I'll see if I can configure my laptop to use one of the problematic devices' mac address.