From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B697C1975A for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0267020789 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com header.i=@broadcom.com header.b="MWAVIOL/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727452AbgCYOxt (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:53:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:32848 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726969AbgCYOxt (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:53:49 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id a25so3549479wrd.0 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 07:53:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KV0TZCjWWTeWjmW9AXwA1pkwpWe1fDh8FQHa+37H9Vo=; b=MWAVIOL/BLIT0DJsSBq3RN75zT41s9bRIfA+zSJFIwTxL+Tg5ulf/KCeifvTDcNRc5 jvM0ver5iYEndGOhdMnoQ6+6V2RGNtv8ntJf21Pql8rta/m26c8mlzMLDYoj+24xrsZm Nue+dVVSU6Zqzu2ORVl37ZKmIgw8pVd79HbSk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KV0TZCjWWTeWjmW9AXwA1pkwpWe1fDh8FQHa+37H9Vo=; b=SHzQzAuZ4kjOm2W/4Wxnf7R0diMQPfkaQcqZ7w0oCMVl+gldjSd/DTjvyD/SO4CnYq uzyQv9xk9G/PmsmBxVAD2QPx2eyRNVFzCmEVGAKNNyPVsCabYwDaqwjAulOUsTv+dZQa /jK1+TO+w8rCtW2Cz058i5Tsvxd32rIl3iMbdeSqLjBaTrSiyLabgowN72hsxe6n7iv/ zz+15fVVMhyBB1l95atlKmZTubSHZAcgyE0JZ2UW17nv979Sx4+op4WMZH/RORArxA4b 4LMEQDRH81JimQtSAiyclp3u2peNCyt4qFJDxX+SsUcN29RXfQ4jk1R8pG94uTdds/AE lE4g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1/A1MiyLGmcOxIe7CA70z2ltk3EUFtdGlCdlk4T8pJYBDbkacu 7eg7Cj98QLodk31d8mwPQLI0kQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvAhGDH99ahq3WM92YZ31JF1yO0v8RSHE/7eJLVBlSdC3h1Eb6prV6ADW64et3HxkO3pB52Qg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:82c5:: with SMTP id 63mr896631wrc.312.1585148027153; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 07:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.38] (f140230.upc-f.chello.nl. [80.56.140.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a13sm34746294wrh.80.2020.03.25.07.53.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 07:53:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Arend Van Spriel To: Tejun Heo , Wright Feng CC: , , , , , Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:53:43 +0100 Message-ID: <171122f50d8.279b.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <20200325140814.GI162390@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1584604406-15452-1-git-send-email-wright.feng@cypress.com> <1584604406-15452-4-git-send-email-wright.feng@cypress.com> <40e33702-d37f-085d-a5a7-7f09ae9e2629@broadcom.com> <241fd81b-a252-ed86-b93e-6796cf1bce23@cypress.com> <20200324182358.GD162390@mtj.duckdns.org> <02b42d9f-7ba3-bb7e-36a6-5e141d37d75d@cypress.com> <20200325140814.GI162390@mtj.duckdns.org> User-Agent: AquaMail/1.23.0-1556 (build: 102300002) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] brcmfmac: make setting SDIO workqueue WQ_HIGHPRI a module parameter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On March 25, 2020 3:08:18 PM Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:29:44PM +0800, Wright Feng wrote: >> If that's incorrect, would you please give me a hint how to set >> __WQ_ORDERED(internal use flag) and WQ_HIGHPRI flags at the same time? > > Wouldn't alloc_ordered_workqueue(NAME, WQ_HIGHPRI, ...) do what you want? That was my initial suggestion. Can WQ_HIGHPRI be used together with WQ_MEMRECLAIM? Regards, Arend