From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-92.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE713757EA for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 02:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.92 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791168276; cv=none; b=Fe3M3QsAlo3l9kk5WhqQ5iY5LgpkYo/ARdUVTiWJncA4YjH+HyWdi6+iZbfIGr5HtXbMKL8Zs8Wk3krys//trbSyXJjBon8YnOU4B+p4PLCG1TB3ZKlx8Z3arIKaANdamp1DOkSatl0wRrd9hNLIr4DkCL9nV2HboPCuAlokwho= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791168276; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4+oVFRM4GfDtzhNlYe798i332jr//6Fy6ecJ1GrKyl0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=nrx6h5HkZyHnclZSEzoURfGNWacX/jfg+ZflqAeyTPvCzvodqFsrnkKtCto7gnTnMjZjKsArDxI4DITfNMc5aExS+AZWjwcbjNgWjpzckBSust42zEog7Ac01BRpEjJjUkkDGuyU8ldsMbf2uuk7IdfmLyfgR673IB1gl47d6CM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=justthetip.ca; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=justthetip.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=justthetip.ca header.i=@justthetip.ca header.b=EudYtato; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.92 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=justthetip.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=justthetip.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=justthetip.ca header.i=@justthetip.ca header.b="EudYtato" X-Envelope-To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=4+oVFRM4GfDtzhNlYe798i332jr//6Fy6ecJ1GrKyl0=; c=simple/simple; d=justthetip.ca; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1791168271; v=1; x=1791773071; b=EudYtatoU3a5LkeAEHtYKRkpfO02k0+SK8O088uU45zBANISIVq4HvjHxqzUAbg9LGIobAYK BrZ+ryY4SbGX36M2gxKx2Z0Ni/sqAw76TVmmRFgBzdHuBeeX7/d74WqQbOFbpL6uU1G7fm4uqBR bpfB7QqiG+MuepIrxG6R0jC9oBLStnhI/uNM4Hy97v8lgYyQIs+r7NacqBXK6ckzJTCftbmYCAG hqrKuKBxVefXnINioAJXKezkPVcaZHM2GYYQzseb6L3m2ULL/jCFpLcWg2G2rOZWx33i2IYoYqD XxYazYDOsBtnvMTcV9hoD0zC3G6nKp8URZrcVY3kj31KQ== X-Envelope-To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 4523754c24812559; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 02:44:31 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 4523754c24812559 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT From: Devin Wittmayer To: Andrei Rusu de Castro Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Jonas Hort , Felix Fietkau , Lorenzo Bianconi , Ryder Lee , Shayne Chen , Sean Wang , Sean Wang , Thorsten Leemhuis , regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: mt76: mt7925: keep MLD membership consistent during link add Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 19:44:27 -0700 Message-ID: <179116826771.8124.9499876634833237978@justthetip.ca> In-Reply-To: <20261004-mt7925-mld-v2-248bb5e6404f@empyreal.works> References: <503eb10e-80cf-493e-95fd-04fc0f94ce01@posteo.de> <476e7721-580e-4a6b-86e5-5ed782a2c7ec@leemhuis.info> <20260829221319.25334-1-lucid_duck@justthetip.ca> <20261003180334.83575-1-lucid_duck@justthetip.ca> <20261004-mt7925-mld-v2-results-248bb5e6404f@empyreal.works> <20261004-mt7925-mld-v2-248bb5e6404f@empyreal.works> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Andrei Rusu de Castro wrote: > USB hardware and the reporter's FritzBox setup remain untested here. Tested on a Netgear A9000 (MT7925U, USB), Linux 7.2.6, firmware 20260813113118, morrownr/mt76 at ce4ee3e, against a two-link mt7996 AP MLD on 5745 and 6135 MHz. Your STA_REC_MLD capture reproduces here. Without v2 the AP got nothing on 5745 in any run I checked. With v2, 5745 carried traffic under the scan load from my earlier report: stock v2 scan load, 600 s, mean per ~10 s 249, 267 MB 801, 837 MB scan load, 600 s, lowest ~10 s 126 B, 33 MB 643, 687 MB scan load, share of bytes on 5745 0 about 60% scanning off, share on 5745 0 0 Stock dipped under that load but did not stall for good this time, so the stall result is Jonas's run, not mine. Tested-by: Devin Wittmayer Thanks, Devin