From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362A3C3A5A1 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 19:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10302217F5 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 19:44:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726658AbfH1Toc (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:44:32 -0400 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:41002 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726603AbfH1Tob (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:44:31 -0400 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.92.1) (envelope-from ) id 1i33rk-00079a-Hx; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:44:25 +0200 Message-ID: <18c4232675c7b4f13fbfe9e5d8e9364a0908f316.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cfg80211: add local BSS receive time to survey information From: Johannes Berg To: Marcel Holtmann , Felix Fietkau Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:44:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9189B2C1-6E5B-4457-9354-A010F946EE33@holtmann.org> References: <20190828102042.58016-1-nbd@nbd.name> <9189B2C1-6E5B-4457-9354-A010F946EE33@holtmann.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 (3.30.5-1.fc29) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi Marcel, > ... [snip] Please trim quotes a bit. > > NL80211_SURVEY_INFO_PAD, > > + NL80211_SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BSS_RX, > > wouldn’t this go before the PAD attribute? No, as usual, that would break ABI. PAD is a regular attribute, just empty and ignored for aligning 64-bit values. johannes