From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
hostap@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mac80211/ath11k: HE mesh support
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:38:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1999032.fCPl2VLiSg@bentobox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a1d7a6651d3bf6c4a43c5bc8659df690c009328.camel@sipsolutions.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1529 bytes --]
On Friday, 12 July 2019 11:42:51 CEST Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 11:36 +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> >
> > There is already a workaround for that in the hostap testcases:
> >
> > if all_cap_one:
> > # It looks like tshark parser was broken at some point for
> > # wlan.mesh.config.cap which is now (tshark 2.6.3) pointing to incorrect
> > # field (same as wlan.mesh.config.ps_protocol). This used to work with
> > # tshark 2.2.6.
> > #
> > # For now, assume the capability field ends up being the last octet of
> > # the frame.
>
> > But maybe you already spotted the problem - it requires that mesh
> > configuration element is the last element. Which is not the case here -
> > similar to 5GHz tests (where you have most likely a VHT cap/oper element
> > after the meshconf_ie).
> >
> > I hope that this makes more sense now.
>
> Ah, yes, it does. So I guess we need to update/fix that workaround.
I will prepare a patch now for hostap after lunch.
> And
> I guess newer tshark (which you used) is fixed again, if I understand
> correctly?
Yes and no, the master branch is fixed. But unfortunately, there is no
release with this fix.
And the problems is there since commit 3c427376579a ("802.11: Use
proto_tree_add_bitmask") and release v2.4.0rc0. But unfortunately, the
workaround was added with commit 2cbaf0de223b ("tests: Work around tshark bug
in wpas_mesh_max_peering") instead of bringing a fix upstream.
Kind regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-12 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 19:35 [PATCH v3 0/3] mac80211/ath11k: HE mesh support Sven Eckelmann
2019-06-12 19:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mac80211_hwsim: Register support for HE meshpoint Sven Eckelmann
2019-06-12 19:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mac80211: implement HE support for mesh Sven Eckelmann
2019-06-14 14:11 ` Johannes Berg
2019-06-14 14:13 ` Sven Eckelmann
2019-06-14 14:14 ` Johannes Berg
2019-06-12 19:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ath11k: register HE mesh capabilities Sven Eckelmann
2019-06-14 14:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] mac80211/ath11k: HE mesh support Johannes Berg
2019-07-03 9:23 ` Sven Eckelmann
2019-07-12 7:58 ` Johannes Berg
2019-07-12 9:36 ` Sven Eckelmann
2019-07-12 9:42 ` Johannes Berg
2019-07-12 10:38 ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1999032.fCPl2VLiSg@bentobox \
--to=sven@narfation.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=hostap@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).