From: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"Jiri Benc" <jbenc@suse.cz>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Jouni Malinen" <j@w1.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hostapd: use eapol frames from ethernet device
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 13:58:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ba2fa240708120358rb22a2f9me1a1020e669406e7@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1186790012.4862.8.camel@johannes.berg>
On 8/11/07, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> Now that the kernel no longer sends them to the management device, grab
> them from ethernet instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
>
> ---
> Maybe the ieee802_1x_receive there should be commented out completely? I
> had it commented out for testing but then only added the comment...
>
> hostapd/driver_devicescape.c | 1 +
> hostapd/hostapd.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> hostapd/hostapd.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --- hostap.orig/hostapd/driver_devicescape.c 2007-08-11 01:06:26.000000000 +0200
> +++ hostap/hostapd/driver_devicescape.c 2007-08-11 01:52:46.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1224,6 +1224,7 @@ static void handle_data(struct hostapd_d
> pos += 2;
> left -= 2;
> switch (ethertype) {
> + /* when we run on older wireless-dev kernels we might get this */
> case ETH_P_PAE:
> ieee802_1x_receive(hapd, sa, pos, left);
> break;
> --- hostap.orig/hostapd/hostapd.c 2007-08-11 01:20:03.000000000 +0200
> +++ hostap/hostapd/hostapd.c 2007-08-11 01:39:00.000000000 +0200
> @@ -574,8 +574,10 @@ static void hostapd_cleanup(struct hosta
> radius_server_deinit(hapd->radius_srv);
> hapd->radius_srv = NULL;
>
> + l2_packet_deinit(hapd->l2_eapol);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_IEEE80211R
> - l2_packet_deinit(hapd->l2);
> + l2_packet_deinit(hapd->l2_rrb);
> #endif /* CONFIG_IEEE80211R */
>
> hostapd_wireless_event_deinit(hapd);
> @@ -906,9 +908,9 @@ static int hostapd_wpa_auth_send_ether(v
> return hapd->driver->send_ether(hapd->drv_priv, dst,
> hapd->own_addr, proto,
> data, data_len);
> - if (hapd->l2 == NULL)
> + if (hapd->l2_rrb == NULL)
> return -1;
> - return l2_packet_send(hapd->l2, dst, proto, data, data_len);
> + return l2_packet_send(hapd->l2_rrb, dst, proto, data, data_len);
> }
>
>
> @@ -1080,6 +1082,13 @@ static int mac_in_conf(struct hostapd_co
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void hostapd_eapol_receive(void *ctx, const u8 *src_addr,
> + const u8 *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct hostapd_data *hapd = ctx;
> +
> + ieee802_1x_receive(hapd, src_addr, buf, len);
> +}
>
> /**
> * hostapd_setup_bss - Per-BSS setup (initialization)
> @@ -1252,6 +1261,15 @@ static int hostapd_setup_bss(struct host
> "failed.\n");
> return -1;
> }
> +
> + hapd->l2_eapol = l2_packet_init(hapd->conf->iface, NULL,
> + ETH_P_EAPOL,
> + hostapd_eapol_receive,
> + hapd, 0);
> + if (!hapd->l2_eapol) {
> + printf("Failed to open l2_packet interface\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> }
>
> if (accounting_init(hapd)) {
> @@ -1278,9 +1296,9 @@ static int hostapd_setup_bss(struct host
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_IEEE80211R
> - hapd->l2 = l2_packet_init(hapd->conf->iface, NULL, ETH_P_RRB,
> - hostapd_rrb_receive, hapd, 0);
> - if (hapd->l2 == NULL &&
> + hapd->l2_rrb = l2_packet_init(hapd->conf->iface, NULL, ETH_P_RRB,
> + hostapd_rrb_receive, hapd, 0);
> + if (hapd->l2_rrb == NULL &&
> (hapd->driver == NULL || hapd->driver->send_ether == NULL)) {
> printf("Failed to open l2_packet interface\n");
> return -1;
> --- hostap.orig/hostapd/hostapd.h 2007-08-11 01:19:29.000000000 +0200
> +++ hostap/hostapd/hostapd.h 2007-08-11 01:19:56.000000000 +0200
> @@ -167,7 +167,8 @@ struct hostapd_data {
> struct full_dynamic_vlan *full_dynamic_vlan;
> #endif /* CONFIG_FULL_DYNAMIC_VLAN */
>
> - struct l2_packet_data *l2;
> + struct l2_packet_data *l2_rrb;
> + struct l2_packet_data *l2_eapol;
> };
>
>
>
>
Isn't the removal of management interface a bit premature? I didn't
see any proposal how to move management packets to the application
level? If not I would prefer eapol packets be treated on management
path. No data should be received on data interface till security
negotiation is done.
Thanks
Tomas
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-12 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-10 23:48 [PATCH] mac80211: remove special casing of EAPOL on mgmt interface Johannes Berg
2007-08-10 23:53 ` [PATCH] hostapd: use eapol frames from ethernet device Johannes Berg
2007-08-12 10:58 ` Tomas Winkler [this message]
2007-08-13 8:51 ` Johannes Berg
2007-08-13 10:46 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-08-13 11:02 ` Johannes Berg
2007-08-14 22:46 ` Tomas Winkler
2007-08-15 10:58 ` Johannes Berg
2007-08-15 4:16 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-08-20 11:57 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ba2fa240708120358rb22a2f9me1a1020e669406e7@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tomasw@gmail.com \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox