From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]:32201 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750969AbYBDL0K (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:26:10 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so2895181wah.23 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 03:26:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1ba2fa240802040326v425fe147y52f2d8731e3012cb@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080204_112617_095149_5409925E) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:26:10 +0200 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "Johannes Berg" Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: add rate to ieee80211_tx_status Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Felix Fietkau" In-Reply-To: <-2417195033053015320@unknownmsgid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <12020697053277-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com> <1202114774.4188.127.camel@johannes.berg> <1ba2fa240802040153g1d0c9902u6af2ddf3dead975d@mail.gmail.com> <6231174111099834440@unknownmsgid> <1ba2fa240802040227g23fe41adu446adc8f0de22712@mail.gmail.com> <-6799378017406559341@unknownmsgid> <1ba2fa240802040305u611bb7edk3c757b73f40c1037@mail.gmail.com> <-4694429725714512287@unknownmsgid> <1ba2fa240802040321s515e61deld176d79eef2b444d@mail.gmail.com> <-2417195033053015320@unknownmsgid> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Feb 4, 2008 1:23 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > Tomas Winkler wrote: > > No, they are rate specific the are not modulation specific, each of > > them can change from packet to packet. > > Exactly. flags in the bitrate struct aren't meant to change from packet to > packet but be specific to a bitrate. The way I see it these are TX control > or rate control flags, not rate flags. I see, I got it. Yes you are right. they should be part of the statuses. Tomas > johannes >