From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]:10098 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751596AbYC1Hn3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:43:29 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so162170wah.23 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:43:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1ba2fa240803280043g7d0fea74vd76691d836900c15@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080328_074333_689751_15BFD2B0) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:43:27 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: TKIP patches Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Chatre, Reinette" In-Reply-To: <20080328023336.GA10006@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <1ba2fa240803271823m4adecaeat9ad05ee6bb97969b@mail.gmail.com> <20080328023336.GA10006@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:33 AM, John W. Linville wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:23:28AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > John, what restraining you from applying TKIP patches to wireless-testing > > First of all they were acked by Johannes second they need to got into > > wider use, most of the people don't pick up code from the mailing > > list but from git directory. > > Even TKIP is stupid encryption schema and everybody wants see it dead > > it's still used. From our testing our patches reduces significantly > > cpu utilization and throughput. > > If there are any other issues please let us know > > The only TKIP-related patches I have in my queue that haven't been > applied are some cleanups from Harvey Harrison. What other patches > do you mean? The ones from a week or so ago have already been applied. Hmm, have to missed it somehow, my mistake. I've seen only the revert patches before. Thanks Tomas