linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Zhu Yi" <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwl4965: remove useless network and duplicate checking
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 22:02:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ba2fa240805311202t3a88800m131d433cbe9ce9e2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080530202212.GA21212@tuxdriver.com>

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:22 PM, John W. Linville
<linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 09:17:15PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>
>> > > The iwlwifi drivers go to great lengths to avoid passing packets to
>> > > mac80211 they think shouldn't go there, while mac80211 can (of course!)
>> > > handle them very well.
>> > >
>> > > Especially in the case of duplicate packets this is interesting
>> > > because it's such a performance hog (especially for IBSS networks)
>> > > while mac80211 does that work on the side without much effort.
>> > >
>> > > This patch removes all that and leaves only what is absolutely
>> > > necessary for the hardware.
>>
>>
>> > Looks good to me. let me just repost it rebased over our latest code.
>>
>> ping? This one no longer applies.
>
> Was going to ask about that one myself...

I know that's I wanted to delay it. I preferred to rebase one patch
then many other. I will release it in next round, still have some code
movement. It also get proper testing.
Tomas

> --
> John W. Linville
> linville@tuxdriver.com
>

      reply	other threads:[~2008-05-31 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-22  9:03 [PATCH] iwl4965: remove useless network and duplicate checking Johannes Berg
2008-05-22 10:41 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-05-30 19:17   ` Johannes Berg
2008-05-30 20:22     ` John W. Linville
2008-05-31 19:02       ` Tomas Winkler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ba2fa240805311202t3a88800m131d433cbe9ce9e2@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tomasw@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).